Comodo CIS Bug fix policy

[Chuck57]

I had one version, V8 (??) that was a problem on an old computer I had. Other than that, they've all done okay. Again, proactive setting, CS tweaks and (for the 'experts') LEAVE IT ALONE.

 

[Pico]

Why does Comodo constantly add new Bells And Whistles to CIS when everybody is constantly urged to leave it alone and urged not to use those Bells And Whistles?
Do they add it just for the fun of it, make it look good in window display or only for fake marketing purposes?

Get a new car find bugs go back and all you hear is LEAVE IT ALONE. Great.

 

[Chuck57]

"Constantly adding bells and whistles." What bells and whistles?

By your own statements, Comodo Firewall hasn't changed in years. It's abandonware.
You're saying that guy above from PC Security Channel is wrong? Doesn't know what he's doing. Isn't an expert?

 

[bazang]

but it's the lack of IPv6 firewall filtering that bugs me

Regardless of the third party security solution that you use, IPv6 should be disabled on your system. That's just Security 101 as IPv6 after all these years has multiple unresolved security issues.

"Constantly adding bells and whistles." What bells and whistles?

By your own statements, Comodo Firewall hasn't changed in years. It's abandonware.

Murdered by words.

I'm facing the truth that it failed on me very badly and left my system completely unprotected without me knowing...

One can search the web literally find the same sad tale about other software. Software that you would rate as "Refined" and "Polished."

It is software. Crap happens. Either cope with it or get out of the Playing-with-Security-Software Game.

I absolutely don't screw with it. As an expert user I like to configure it to my own liking. It's the software which screws up my system not the user in this case.

Comodo will never deliver what you want. So you are better served by never using it again. Ever. Never. Never Ever. When the next version is released if you try it because you think it will be better then your thinking and behavior is a prime example of the definition of insanity - doing something over again and expecting a different result.

The entire point of CS configuration is that CIS\CFW have bugs and the configuration provides very high security while avoiding all the bugs that drive you people bonkers.

Some people can cope with bugs. They are OK with workarounds as long as it delivers what they want. For you, you want to highly configure Comodo and that just is not possible without experience bugs & issues. It is not suitable for your needs. It will not deliver what you want.

All that said, it will give you high security using CS configuration.

 

[Chuck57]

Some people can cope with bugs. They are OK with workarounds as long as it delivers what they want. For you, you want to highly configure Comodo and that just is not possible without experience bugs & issues. It is not suitable for your needs. It will not deliver what you want.

All that said, it will give you high security using CS configuration.

That isn't what they want to read. They're experts, after all. They know all about a product they admit to not even using.

 

[Chuck57]

... debating a Comodo fanatic (irresponsible & immoral) is exactly the same as debating a Flat-Earther:

View attachment 285257

So, you're going to ignore that YouTube review from PC Security Channel?

 

[Behold Eck]

Hi @Chuck57 !

With all due respect, maybe it is because of your high age, but you have an incredible difficulty in differentiating what is your particular case from what are general cases. Repeatedly, you commit the fallacy of making inferences about particular premises (projected) to universal premises. You will never accept that your case with Comodo does not apply to 99.99% of people!

Also possibly because of your high age (and again, I say this with all due respect), you make use and abuse of selectivities (for you, only your arguments are the truth, as well as your analysis, your videos, your experts, your etc, you own the truth... you are completely blind to the arguments, proofs, facts and evidences presented by other people). Among several problems, that also makes you a very intolerant person.

And as the cherry on the top, you exploit the “one weight and two measures” sophism, you decry in other participants what you yourself use to substantiate your beliefs about Comodo.

I repeat, and again I say this with all due respect... clearly this has to do with your age, and your enormous difficulty in dealing with changes, new habits, new technologies... and with arguments with which you do not agree.

But what makes you a fanatic is not your religious devotion to Comodo (that is your freedom and your right)! You are a fanatic because you are intolerant, a person unable to listen to what others say, unable to understand that others have the same freedom and right to disagree with you, or to criticize Comodo.

Comodo has been proven to work time and time again which is why people here use it.

Don`t forget that with age comes wisdom which going by your immature posts is going to take a long long time for you.

Regards Eck

 

[Trident]

Comodo has been proven to work time and time again which is why people here use it.

Don`t forget that with age comes wisdom which going by your immature posts is going to take a long long time for you.

Regards Eck

And it has also been proven to not work, times and times again.

 

[Behold Eck]

And it has also been proven to not work, times and times again.

Well it still works for me(and others) ergo I use it.

Regards Eck

 

[Behold Eck]

Hi @Behold Eck !

Here's your score for the past few weeks at Comodo threads:

Personal Attacks: One hundred points! Kudos!

Proof, evidence, content, facts, etc.: Zero points.

PS: Your personal attacks are not going to make Comodo a better software. Your personal attacks are not going to change the sad reality that Comodo is a software that has been abandoned for years, full of unfixed bugs, and with many negative reviews from experts.

Now, now no need to start throwing your toys out of the pram(again).

All I can do is point towards any cruelsistor video as proof Comodos effectiveness. It`s the bald fact that it works that seems to fuel your OTT animosity.

Well I would award you 1000 points for personal attacks but I not going to go to that level.

Oops I just did.

Regards Eck

 

[Chuck57]

Hi @Chuck57 !

With all due respect, maybe it is because of your high age, but you have an incredible difficulty in differentiating what is your particular case from what are general cases. Repeatedly, you commit the fallacy of making inferences about particular premises (projected) to universal premises. You will never accept that your case with Comodo does not apply to 99.99% of people!

Also possibly because of your high age (and again, I say this with all due respect), you make use and abuse of selectivities (for you, only your arguments are the truth, as well as your analysis, your videos, your experts, your etc, you own the truth... you are completely blind to the arguments, proofs, facts and evidences presented by other people). Among several problems, that also makes you a very intolerant person.

And as the cherry on the top, you exploit the “one weight and two measurements” sophism, you decry in other participants what you yourself use to substantiate your beliefs about Comodo.

I repeat, and again I say this with all due respect... clearly this has to do with your age, and your enormous difficulty in dealing with changes, new habits, new technologies... and with arguments with which you do not agree.

But what makes you a fanatic is not your religious devotion to Comodo (that is your freedom and your right)! You are a fanatic because you are intolerant, a person unable to listen to what others say, unable to understand that others have the same freedom and right to disagree with you, or to criticize Comodo.

Decopi, do you realize that just about every single thing you mentioned, other than my advanced age, also applies to you? Everything. In every paragraph, especially the last paragraph where you accuse me of doing exactly, 100%, what you did and are doing in your post.

 

[wat0114]

Regardless of the third party security solution that you use, IPv6 should be disabled on your system. That's just Security 101 as IPv6 after all these years has multiple unresolved security issues.

With the exception of a poorly configured network, there's no reason to disable IPv6.

 

[Chuck57]

... maybe "you could do it", but you never did it, absolutely none of your posts contain facts, evidences, proofs or content... your posts only have personal attacks.

And you have not pointed to anyone's videos, because those videos do not constitute proofs, are not made by experts, do not follow protocols, nor are they universally verifiable. Also, it is never too much to say that it constitutes a selectivity to point to the arguments of 1 single participant at MT as evidence, while you ignore, or minimize, or disqualify all evidence that is presented by other participants.

And yours do?

 

[Behold Eck]

... maybe "you could do it", but you never did it, absolutely none of your posts contain facts, evidences, proofs or content... your posts only have personal attacks.

And you have not pointed to anyone's videos, because those videos do not constitute proofs, are not made by experts, do not follow protocols, nor are they universally verifiable. Also, it is never too much to say that it constitutes a selectivity to point to the arguments of 1 single participant at MT as evidence, while you ignore, or minimize, or disqualify all evidence that is presented by other participants.

Do it yourself.

Regards Eck

 

[Behold Eck]

Decopi, do you realize that just about every single thing you mentioned, other than my advanced age, also applies to you? Everything. In every paragraph, especially the last paragraph where you accuse me of doing exactly, 100%, what you did and are doing in your post.

I wouldn`t bother Chuck he`s stuck on attack mode. Not much sense is gonna get through.

Regards Eck

 

[Chuck57]

... please, pay more attention to my posts!, I almost never address to any specific participant! I always address to “the (irresponsible and immoral) fanatics of Comodo”. Therefore, it is not my fault that you feel alluded to or offended. I repeat, I never address you personally, and that happens because I respect the right and freedoms of all people to use the software they want.

Where did I imply being offended. Hell, I agree. I'm old. However, your very first sentence was directed at me. "With all due respect, maybe it is because of your high age, but you have an incredible difficulty in differentiating what is your particular case from what are general cases."

The next paragraph is entirely focused on me "Also possibly because of your high age (and again, I say this with all due respect), you make use and abuse of selectivities (for you, only your arguments are the truth, as well as your analysis, your videos, your experts, your etc, you own the truth... you are completely blind to the arguments, proofs, facts and evidences presented by other people). Among several problems, that also makes you a very intolerant person."

And the 3rd, 4th and 5th paragraphs, are full of you, you, you, and reference my antiquity (that sounds better than being a fossilized old geezer). Age aside, I'm not sure what you're smoking, to think no one can go back only a few posts above and see who you were referencing through the entire post.

 

[bazang]

Hi @Chuck57 !

You will never accept that your case with Comodo does not apply to 99.99% of people!

That is a sweeping generalization infused with copious amounts of speculation to the extent that it just ain't true.

But what makes you a fanatic is not your religious devotion to Comodo (that is your freedom and your right)! You are a fanatic because you are intolerant, a person unable to listen to what others say, unable to understand that others have the same freedom and right to disagree with you, or to criticize Comodo.

They do understand. And they agree with you. All they are doing is saying "I (we) do not experience the bugs and it works for me (us)." They admit that Comodo has bugs and issues. It is software. They understand software. There is a way around the bugs and issues. It is CS configuration.

None of them are saying "Comodo is the greatest, most powerful security software in the universe and every person on Earth needs to use it!" All they are saying is "It works for me, and therefore I use it."

The problem over-and-over again with you is you take a simple post made by people like @Chuck57 , @Behold Eck, @cruelsister and others - deliberately twist it using your own agenda words and mis-characterize\mis-categorize their posts and usage of Comodo as "irresponsible and immoral" fanatics.

@Chuck57 , @Behold Eck , @cruelsister , and others all know and agree that people encounter bugs and other issues. They also agree that others can experience serious problems with Comodo. At the same time they are capable of making Comodo work successfully for them. That in no way makes them fanatics.

Stating "It works for me" does not make anybody a fanatic.

It is weird that you use every opportunity to rage against Comodo by twisting others' posts. Even when others agree with you - but using words and phrases that you deliberately ignore what they posted - and automatically default to "You are an irresponsible and immoral Comodo fanatic."

 

[Chuck57]

I wouldn`t bother Chuck he`s stuck on attack mode. Not much sense is gonna get through.

Regards Eck

And he can't see that what he's accusing us of is exactly what he's been doing for as long as I remember, in every Comodo thread.

 

[Trident]

And yours do?

Yes, his posts included evidence. Not sure if it was on this thread, there are many Comodo threads every day so it’s hard to keep up.

 

[bazang]

while you ignore, or minimize, or disqualify all evidence that is presented by other participants.

You never supply evidence either.

Any of you that dislike Comodo so much all have the opportunity to pentest it and provide video proof that it is a terrible security software, but none of you critics ever do.

When test labs such as AVLab.pl test it in specialized use-case scenarios, and Comodo performs extremely well, then you and others attack the test results as "flawed" and state all manner of incorrect things because your intent is to undermine the results and make anyone that posts them as evidence as "irresponsible and immoral fanatics."