Therefore, if a Comodo employee posts something, it becomes official. Period.
The employees on the Comodo are low-level employees. So unless you can produce a statement made by either the Comodo public relations office or other designated person, then it is not official. Until then, there is no official statement by Comodo that "Comodo is not compatible with Windows 11." This is a matter of established consumer law.
Technically, any statement made by any employee on the Comodo forum, except for Melih or a designated person authorized to issue statements officially on behalf of Comodo, their statement is unofficial.
I am in no way whatsoever criticizing you for your analysis, statements and position. As far as I am concerned Comodo can kill off CIS and CF, and it would not matter to me one bit. I am just pointing out that, technically, Comodo has issued no official statement about the compatibility with Windows 11.
I did look at the statements on the Comodo forum and no Comodo employee explicitly states "Comodo is not secure on Windows 11 due to bugs and compatibility. Do not use it on Windows 11 as your security is compromised." A general statement of "not compatible" by a low-level employee could simply mean "the GUI does not work correctly" within the context of the thread discussion.
You made a reference to Comodo saying "Use our product at your own risk [on Windows 11]." Have you actually read the entire EULA? Within its terms, no matter what, under any circumstances, the user is ALWAYS responsible for whatever happens and they ALWAYS use the software at their own risk. Comodo uses a standard EULA template which is the same with every other software publisher that I have read.
The Comodo fanboys are the manipulators. They are incapable of understanding that their subjective opinions will never be a criterion for general conclusions. Against reality and facts, they are blindly convinced that their subjective opinions are the universal truth.
Now, from my side, with all due respect, I just made a little joke about a ridiculous situation, where the reality is "X" and fanboys are seeing "Y", that's all. It's like a cult of fanatics or flat earthers.
Your statements here are applicable to all the fanpersons of other software here. It is just not a Comodo fanperson (politically correct terminology)l thing.
Investing beliefs or emotions in software... sounds psycho-pathological.
I did not say you are investing emotions. Although others here are deeply invested. Some to a degree such that no matter what legitimate evidence or logical argument you give, they will not change their point of view. Then again, some could put forth a sound argument that using Comodo, even in its "questionable" state with the regards to Windows 11, is much more secure than using Windows Defender. On that basis I have to agree until it is proven that Comodo is unsafe on Windows 11. Windows Defender (as do other security software) have bugs that reduce their security - and these bugs do not get reported or do not get fixed. Microsoft, Norton, Avast, others have had bugs reported to them and never fixed them. Microsoft is particularly notorious for this. Now I know this is a "whataboutism" and I am not using that as any justification. I am merely pointing out that Comodo is no worse than other security software publishers.
What you said... that is what many people do. They invest themselves very deeply in all kinds of products. Just look at the amount of disputes and drama that happen over software X. It happens here and leads to threads being closed and people getting banned. There is a lot of "-isms" when it comes to people and the products they are devoted to, not to mention the "-isms" of forum and social media participation.
Software, particularly games, is a prime example. I do not know where security software ranks, but fanboyism\fangirlism in that category has to be in the upper 50%.
Fanboyism, Emotions, Mantras, Fanaticism, Denial, etc... is not going to help Comodo.
Comodo probably has the most ardent fanpersons of all consumer security software. You are right though, because all of that hard work they do reporting stuff, a high percentage of the legitimate stuff reported never gets fixed.
Go and read through Melih's subforum. He stated years ago that (paraphrase) "Comodo is a freeware and it, along with all the other software, is developed at my pleasure." That is a polite way of saying "Stop complaining because I fully subsidize the software, develop it and make it free, and therefore none of you have any right to complain." Melih has never changed this position.
