Isn't that wonderful for you?All Norton drivers for example on Windows have been updated on the 14/10/22.
Drivers responsible for AV scanning and emulation as well as disinfection have been updated yesterday last.
But you claimed that others have not updated their drivers for years. I have just opened a Windows laptop, browsed through the Norton folder and I see all code has been modified months, some just a day ago.
Your going around in circles, so just agree to disagree 
Sylvester Stallone Fight GIF By Rocky:Get a room you two
I never said that publishers NEVER update their drivers. I said they have not updated some drivers in years. Why would a publisher update a driver that is working? Do you think that publishers go on fishing expeditions to check their drivers constantly? That's not how it works. Unless there is an indication that a driver has a problem or there is something new that is being implemented, there generally is no reason to update a driver.But you claimed that others have not updated their drivers for years. I have just opened a Windows laptop, browsed through the Norton folder and I see all code has been modified months, some just a day ago.
Including drivers.
It has nothing to do with Comodo, it is related to your claim.
Let's just see how much FUD and complete nonsense Trident can come up with. They keep trying. So gotta give them an A for Effort. I find the ad hominems rather amusing. I want to see what Trident's imagination can come up with next.Get a room you two
And here it is. The entertainment I have been waiting for.
You claimed that Kaspersky, Bitdefender and a bunch of others (not defined who exactly) did not update their drivers for years.
Which is correct.
No. It is not wrong because there are drivers that have not been updated in years.
Neglect has nothing to do with it. Drivers are only updated if there is a proven problem or a new feature is introduced. Security enhancements are not something that needs to be done on a regualr basis.
No. They do not. There is no such duty nor requirement. Drivers and software are provided on a "best effort" basis and per the terms of the EULA, or in the case of a commercial or government contract, per the SLA. A software publisher located anywhere is not compelled to do anything.
Not fixing GUI bugs is not neglect. Not fixing bugs that are not a security concern is not neglect.
All publishers provide software on a "best effort" basis.
Go research the Windows kernel. Microsoft released it in its entirety. And the Linux kernel is open source.
Every publisher, specially Kaspersky, Bitdefender, “bunch of others”, Microsoft, Comodo every day contacts him to inform him of all changes made and planned to be implemented.
Which are these drivers? Do you have any example?
Yet all the companies do them on regular basis. Many supply few changelogs - one regarding the general changes and one or more regarding their protection engines. Only Comodo is so good it doesn’t need enhancements.
Again, untrue. There are various companies offering malware warranty, as well as identity theft insurance. You need to research the field better.
If you say so.
Do you know what! You are losing credibility by the minute. You say this statements which have zero integrity and when asked for proof - you say go research - this is not difficult. I am not interested in that research. The burden of proof is on you because you made that statement.
Nobody needs contact from a publisher. It is industry practice. You should put forth the effort to be better informed.Every publisher, specially Kaspersky, Bitdefender, “bunch of others”, Microsoft, Comodo every day contacts him to inform him of all changes made and planned to be implemented.
Sure. Go research the Windows and Linux network drivers. Then take a look at Kaspersky's and Bitdefender's firewall drivers.
lol, no they don't. You are talking nonsense. A protection engine is often a service, and that's not a driver. Please show us examples of changelogs that show regular driver updates. Oh wait, you can't.
If you say so. That does not change the fact that I am not wrong. But you can think and believe whatever you wish.
Well, it's just one of those things that you just have to put in the effort yourself. The burden is on you to do the research. You can do it as it is not difficult to understand. But as you said you are more interested in making ad hominems instead of enlightening yourself.
No! You need to do this research because you are presenting us with these statements which are not factual! You would need to do the research. You talk as if you know all about windows and linux network drivers, all about Kaspersky and Bitdefender.
Is this how they work at Appguard?
You are the one making non sensical statements not me Trident asked for examples and I provided them. They just have to do a little bit to have a look-see. It is very easy to inspect them.
I have gathered here EULAs of companies that can be considered market leaders. Please point out where these “publishers” state that.
A protection engine is a lot more than a service. And yes, they do. They will not tell you we updated drivers A, B and C and will not provide you with the updates source code, but all of them maintain various changelogs on the security enhancements implemented - and these frequently require updates to various platforms, components and drivers as well.
Will do in a moment.
I told you where to get the infos. You just have to take the next step. It is up to you.
You have not told where to get the info! You haven't said anything except "blah blah - this is how windows works. Blah blah , windows drivers have not been updated in years" "blah blah"
