- Jan 6, 2022
- 530
Kaspersky is amazing. Especially in default deny!
In my house f-secure safe is used in 3 machines and one of my two main machines has Kaspersky Internet Security, the other has f-secure safe, and has had it for almost 3 years. Kaspersky is a fast program on my machine, and I don't think it's slower than f-secure or anything else I've tested. I'm just waiting for the new program for Kaspersky in Norway. It is positive that Kaspersky came out so well in the test.Amazing Thank you. Now I will going to install them all on my Packard Bell 386SX
I would love to use Kaspersky but they are on my own personal embargo list do to the actions that are not their own. Secondly, last time I used it (2018) I found it heavy on my system.
Hello and welcome to this comparison!
Following a big request, I decided to make this comparison.
Small precision: The antivirus have not been configured, only the detection of suspicious applications has been activated on Eset, because I had some. Otherwise the rest is by default, just to put them in a situation of a computer novice.
Then, there was NO pause! The URLs and packages are the same for the 4 antivirus programs tested and were tested in the same way.
And finally, the shooting took me 4 hours with 1 hour of editing. The antiviruses are already classified during the editing.
F-Secure : F-Secure is a very good antivirus and provides a decent protection.
Unfortunately, it is 4th because it let through the Magniber Ransomware which encrypted my test files and several files of the virtual machine.
Bitdefender: Bitdefender provides a more family friendly protection due to its numerous shields. However, I noticed a drop in web detection (its anti-malware shield was very solicitous) which lowers the score. Then, its BB is excellent, but reacts a little late on scripts. Finally, NPE detected a malware that Bitdefender recognizes, but failed to remove it. It is 3rd.
Eset: Less shield than the others, but very powerful, it's Eset!
Eset impressed me in this test, due to an excellent database, and has the luxury to catch up with all my scripts!
It is 2nd because Eset does not have pro-active shields, and let pass a fake crack file, which installed multitudes of files (which were blocked by Eset). You can see it during the analysis.
Kaspersky : Kaspersky becomes the number 1 of this comparison! It is ultra complete, has several shields and its Watcher system is powerful. Very efficient because it also erased the dropper of the fake crack and also several files during the execution of the pack!
@franz and @TedCruz request
Is there a way to secure against Magniber Ransomware with f-secure safe as you see it?
Is there a way to secure against Magniber Ransomware with f-secure safe as you see it?
Kaspersky Free also has System Watcher and intrusion protection so the result would have been the sameGreat video once again.
How would Kaspersky Free have done in this test? Was anything blocked by the “paid” modules in Kaspersky?
I installed NVT SysHardener v1.5 and OSarmor 1.8.1.0 along with f-secure safe, is it overkill?You can use SysHardener
I installed NVT SysHardener v1.5 and OSarmor 1.8.1.0 along with f-secure safe, is it overkill?
So I just have OSarmor as is. Did not do any changes with it, but if you think I should, I will be happy to hear what to doYes...
OSArmor would have been enough in your case
If I can get a download link, yesI have noticed Google's AV seems to do better on Virus Total than most of these AV's. Could you test it please?
If I can get a download link, yes
That's nothing new Google bought Virustotal back in 2012.VirusTotal is now a Google product