App Review Shadowra's Big Comparative : Episode 2 - Paid Antivirus

It is advised to take all reviews with a grain of salt. In extreme cases some reviews use dramatization for entertainment purposes.
Content created by
Shadowra

IceMan7

Level 3
Mar 19, 2025
140
What about BD? It's located in Slovakia and should be comparable in this regard. Also, they have the coolest logo out there, hands down. ;)
Bitdefender is from Romania ;)
And as a curiosity, Eset is the most popular antivirus in Poland. Once only Kasperky could compete with it for the number of users. Because of the war in Ukraine, at Kaspersky's expense, Eset gained even more customers ;)


I use the Linguist extension ;)
 
Last edited:

oldschool

Level 85
Verified
Top Poster
Well-known
Mar 29, 2018
8,028
Bitdefender is a cyber security company founded in 2001, in Bucharest, Romania. Its main products revolve around cyber security services for individuals and companies, including endpoint protection, multi-cloud security, anti-virus software, virtual private networks (VPN), and Internet of Things (IoT) security.
@IceMan7 Yes, I had both locations in my mind and mistyped. Thank you!
 

IceMan7

Level 3
Mar 19, 2025
140
I will add from my side, because I could no longer edit my message.

In Poland, Eset is the most popular of the paid solutions. Avast has always ruled the free market in Poland, followed by AVG.
Of the paid ones, Norton is also popular. And then the rest, like Bitdefender, Gdata, etc. or once Kasperky
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nevi and Andrew999

franz

Level 9
Verified
Well-known
May 29, 2021
444

Unmasking Avast: Is it a US Company?​

November 13, 2024 by Brad Williams
In the realm of cybersecurity, few names are as recognizable as Avast. With a user base spanning millions worldwide, Avast has established itself as a leading provider of antivirus software and other security solutions. However, despite its global presence, there’s a lingering question about Avast’s origins and ownership: Is Avast a US company? In this article, we’ll delve into the history of Avast, its current structure, and the implications of its ownership to provide a comprehensive answer.
Table of Contents

A Brief History of Avast​

To understand Avast’s current status, it’s essential to explore its roots. Avast was founded in 1988 in Prague, Czechoslovakia (now the Czech Republic) by Eduard Kučera and Pavel Baudiš. Initially, the company focused on developing antivirus software for computers, with its first product being a program designed to remove the Vienna virus. Over the years, Avast expanded its product line to include a range of security solutions, from antivirus software to VPNs and password managers.

Early Success and Expansion​

Avast’s early success can be attributed to its innovative approach to cybersecurity. In the late 1990s, the company introduced its first antivirus program, which quickly gained popularity due to its effectiveness and user-friendly interface. As the internet became increasingly widespread, Avast expanded its operations to cater to the growing demand for cybersecurity solutions. The company established partnerships with major tech firms, including Microsoft and Intel, to integrate its software into their products.

Avast’s Current Structure​

So, is Avast a US company? To answer this, let’s examine Avast’s current structure. In 2016, Avast acquired AVG Technologies, another cybersecurity firm, in a deal worth $1.3 billion. This acquisition significantly expanded Avast’s user base and product portfolio. Today, Avast is a multinational company with offices in several countries, including the United States, the Czech Republic, and the United Kingdom.

Ownership and Headquarters​

Avast is a privately-held company, with its headquarters located in Prague, Czech Republic. While the company has a significant presence in the United States, with offices in San Francisco and other cities, its ownership and control remain firmly rooted in the Czech Republic. The company’s founders, Eduard Kučera and Pavel Baudiš, still hold key positions in the company, with Baudiš serving as the CEO.

Implications of Avast’s Ownership​

The question of Avast’s ownership has implications for users, particularly in the context of data privacy and security. As a non-US company, Avast is not subject to the same data retention and surveillance laws as US-based companies. This means that Avast is not required to store user data on US soil or comply with US government requests for data access.

Data Privacy and Security​

Avast’s commitment to data privacy and security is reflected in its policies and practices. The company adheres to the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), a set of EU regulations that govern data protection and privacy. Avast also uses end-to-end encryption to protect user data and has a strict no-logging policy, ensuring that user activity is not monitored or recorded.

Avast’s US Presence​

While Avast is not a US company, it has a significant presence in the United States. The company has offices in several US cities, including San Francisco, New York, and Miami. Avast’s US operations are focused on sales, marketing, and customer support, with the company employing hundreds of staff members across the country.

Partnerships and Collaborations​

Avast has established partnerships with several US-based companies, including tech giants like Microsoft and Intel. These partnerships enable Avast to integrate its software into a range of products, from laptops to smartphones. Avast also collaborates with US-based cybersecurity firms to share threat intelligence and improve its security solutions.

Conclusion​

In conclusion, while Avast has a significant presence in the United States, it is not a US company. Avast’s ownership and control remain firmly rooted in the Czech Republic, with its headquarters located in Prague. The company’s commitment to data privacy and security is reflected in its policies and practices, which adhere to EU regulations and industry standards. As a leading provider of cybersecurity solutions, Avast continues to innovate and expand its product line, protecting millions of users worldwide from cyber threats.

CompanyHeadquartersFoundersYear Founded
AvastPrague, Czech RepublicEduard Kučera and Pavel Baudiš1988
In the ever-evolving landscape of cybersecurity, Avast remains a trusted name, committed to protecting users from the latest threats. Whether you’re a individual user or a business, Avast’s range of security solutions offers peace of mind in an increasingly uncertain digital world.

Is Avast a US Company?​

Avast is not a US company, despite its global presence and popularity. It was founded in 1988 in Prague, Czech Republic, and has since maintained its headquarters there. Although Avast has expanded its operations to various countries, including the United States, its roots and primary operations remain in the Czech Republic.

Avast’s Czech origins are reflected in its corporate structure and ownership. The company is listed on the London Stock Exchange and is subject to Czech and European Union laws and regulations. While Avast has partnerships and subsidiaries in the US, its core identity and decision-making processes are centered in the Czech Republic.

Where is Avast’s Headquarters Located?​

Avast’s headquarters is located in Prague, Czech Republic. The company has maintained its primary operations in Prague since its founding in 1988. The Czech Republic provides a strategic location for Avast, allowing it to access European markets and talent while also being close to other major tech hubs.

Avast’s Prague headquarters serves as the central hub for its global operations, housing key teams, including research and development, marketing, and executive leadership. The company’s presence in Prague has contributed to the growth of the local tech industry, making it a significant player in the Czech Republic’s economy.

Is Avast Owned by a US Company?​

Avast is not owned by a US company. In 2021, Avast merged with NortonLifeLock, a US-based cybersecurity company, to form a new entity called Gen Digital. However, this merger did not result in Avast becoming a US-owned company. Instead, Gen Digital is a holding company that operates both Avast and NortonLifeLock as separate brands.

The merger between Avast and NortonLifeLock aimed to create a global cybersecurity leader, combining the strengths of both companies. While the merged entity, Gen Digital, has a significant presence in the US, Avast’s operations and identity remain distinct and tied to its Czech origins.

Does Avast Collect User Data?​

Like many cybersecurity companies, Avast collects user data to improve its products and services. The company gathers data on malware threats, user behavior, and system information to enhance its threat detection and prevention capabilities. However, Avast has faced criticism in the past for its data collection practices, particularly regarding the sale of user data to third-party companies.

Avast has since revised its data collection policies, providing users with more control over their data and ensuring that it is anonymized and aggregated to prevent individual identification. The company has also implemented measures to protect user data, including encryption and secure storage.

Is Avast a Safe Antivirus Software?​

Avast is generally considered a safe and effective antivirus software. It has a strong track record of detecting and removing malware, and its products have received positive reviews from independent testing labs. Avast’s software is also certified by various industry organizations, such as VB100 and AV-Test.

However, as with any software, Avast is not immune to vulnerabilities and potential security risks. Users should ensure they keep their Avast software up to date and follow best practices for online security, such as avoiding suspicious downloads and using strong passwords.

Can I Trust Avast with My Personal Data?​

Avast has faced scrutiny in the past regarding its handling of user data, which has raised concerns about trust. However, the company has taken steps to address these concerns and improve its data protection practices. Avast has implemented robust security measures to safeguard user data, including encryption, secure storage, and access controls.

Users should still exercise caution when sharing personal data with any company, including Avast. It is essential to review Avast’s privacy policies and understand how the company collects, uses, and protects user data. By being informed and taking control of their data, users can make an educated decision about trusting Avast with their personal information.

Is Avast Free Version Enough for My Needs?​

Avast’s free version offers robust antivirus protection and is suitable for many users’ needs. The free version includes features such as malware detection, real-time protection, and Wi-Fi scanning. However, it lacks some advanced features, such as password management, firewall protection, and anti-ransomware protection, which are available in Avast’s paid versions.

Users with basic security needs, such as protecting against common malware and viruses, may find the free version sufficient. However, those who require more comprehensive protection, such as gamers, businesses, or users who handle sensitive data, may need to upgrade to a paid version to access additional features and enhanced security.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

TuxTalk

Level 14
Verified
Top Poster
Well-known
Nov 9, 2022
687

Unmasking Avast: Is it a US Company?​

November 13, 2024 by Brad Williams
In the realm of cybersecurity, few names are as recognizable as Avast. With a user base spanning millions worldwide, Avast has established itself as a leading provider of antivirus software and other security solutions. However, despite its global presence, there’s a lingering question about Avast’s origins and ownership: Is Avast a US company? In this article, we’ll delve into the history of Avast, its current structure, and the implications of its ownership to provide a comprehensive answer.
Table of Contents

A Brief History of Avast​

To understand Avast’s current status, it’s essential to explore its roots. Avast was founded in 1988 in Prague, Czechoslovakia (now the Czech Republic) by Eduard Kučera and Pavel Baudiš. Initially, the company focused on developing antivirus software for computers, with its first product being a program designed to remove the Vienna virus. Over the years, Avast expanded its product line to include a range of security solutions, from antivirus software to VPNs and password managers.

Early Success and Expansion​

Avast’s early success can be attributed to its innovative approach to cybersecurity. In the late 1990s, the company introduced its first antivirus program, which quickly gained popularity due to its effectiveness and user-friendly interface. As the internet became increasingly widespread, Avast expanded its operations to cater to the growing demand for cybersecurity solutions. The company established partnerships with major tech firms, including Microsoft and Intel, to integrate its software into their products.

Avast’s Current Structure​

So, is Avast a US company? To answer this, let’s examine Avast’s current structure. In 2016, Avast acquired AVG Technologies, another cybersecurity firm, in a deal worth $1.3 billion. This acquisition significantly expanded Avast’s user base and product portfolio. Today, Avast is a multinational company with offices in several countries, including the United States, the Czech Republic, and the United Kingdom.

Ownership and Headquarters​

Avast is a privately-held company, with its headquarters located in Prague, Czech Republic. While the company has a significant presence in the United States, with offices in San Francisco and other cities, its ownership and control remain firmly rooted in the Czech Republic. The company’s founders, Eduard Kučera and Pavel Baudiš, still hold key positions in the company, with Baudiš serving as the CEO.

Implications of Avast’s Ownership​

The question of Avast’s ownership has implications for users, particularly in the context of data privacy and security. As a non-US company, Avast is not subject to the same data retention and surveillance laws as US-based companies. This means that Avast is not required to store user data on US soil or comply with US government requests for data access.

Data Privacy and Security​

Avast’s commitment to data privacy and security is reflected in its policies and practices. The company adheres to the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), a set of EU regulations that govern data protection and privacy. Avast also uses end-to-end encryption to protect user data and has a strict no-logging policy, ensuring that user activity is not monitored or recorded.

Avast’s US Presence​

While Avast is not a US company, it has a significant presence in the United States. The company has offices in several US cities, including San Francisco, New York, and Miami. Avast’s US operations are focused on sales, marketing, and customer support, with the company employing hundreds of staff members across the country.

Partnerships and Collaborations​

Avast has established partnerships with several US-based companies, including tech giants like Microsoft and Intel. These partnerships enable Avast to integrate its software into a range of products, from laptops to smartphones. Avast also collaborates with US-based cybersecurity firms to share threat intelligence and improve its security solutions.

Conclusion​

In conclusion, while Avast has a significant presence in the United States, it is not a US company. Avast’s ownership and control remain firmly rooted in the Czech Republic, with its headquarters located in Prague. The company’s commitment to data privacy and security is reflected in its policies and practices, which adhere to EU regulations and industry standards. As a leading provider of cybersecurity solutions, Avast continues to innovate and expand its product line, protecting millions of users worldwide from cyber threats.

CompanyHeadquartersFoundersYear Founded
AvastPrague, Czech RepublicEduard Kučera and Pavel Baudiš1988
In the ever-evolving landscape of cybersecurity, Avast remains a trusted name, committed to protecting users from the latest threats. Whether you’re a individual user or a business, Avast’s range of security solutions offers peace of mind in an increasingly uncertain digital world.

Is Avast a US Company?​

Avast is not a US company, despite its global presence and popularity. It was founded in 1988 in Prague, Czech Republic, and has since maintained its headquarters there. Although Avast has expanded its operations to various countries, including the United States, its roots and primary operations remain in the Czech Republic.

Avast’s Czech origins are reflected in its corporate structure and ownership. The company is listed on the London Stock Exchange and is subject to Czech and European Union laws and regulations. While Avast has partnerships and subsidiaries in the US, its core identity and decision-making processes are centered in the Czech Republic.

Where is Avast’s Headquarters Located?​

Avast’s headquarters is located in Prague, Czech Republic. The company has maintained its primary operations in Prague since its founding in 1988. The Czech Republic provides a strategic location for Avast, allowing it to access European markets and talent while also being close to other major tech hubs.

Avast’s Prague headquarters serves as the central hub for its global operations, housing key teams, including research and development, marketing, and executive leadership. The company’s presence in Prague has contributed to the growth of the local tech industry, making it a significant player in the Czech Republic’s economy.

Is Avast Owned by a US Company?​

Avast is not owned by a US company. In 2021, Avast merged with NortonLifeLock, a US-based cybersecurity company, to form a new entity called Gen Digital. However, this merger did not result in Avast becoming a US-owned company. Instead, Gen Digital is a holding company that operates both Avast and NortonLifeLock as separate brands.

The merger between Avast and NortonLifeLock aimed to create a global cybersecurity leader, combining the strengths of both companies. While the merged entity, Gen Digital, has a significant presence in the US, Avast’s operations and identity remain distinct and tied to its Czech origins.

Does Avast Collect User Data?​

Like many cybersecurity companies, Avast collects user data to improve its products and services. The company gathers data on malware threats, user behavior, and system information to enhance its threat detection and prevention capabilities. However, Avast has faced criticism in the past for its data collection practices, particularly regarding the sale of user data to third-party companies.

Avast has since revised its data collection policies, providing users with more control over their data and ensuring that it is anonymized and aggregated to prevent individual identification. The company has also implemented measures to protect user data, including encryption and secure storage.

Is Avast a Safe Antivirus Software?​

Avast is generally considered a safe and effective antivirus software. It has a strong track record of detecting and removing malware, and its products have received positive reviews from independent testing labs. Avast’s software is also certified by various industry organizations, such as VB100 and AV-Test.

However, as with any software, Avast is not immune to vulnerabilities and potential security risks. Users should ensure they keep their Avast software up to date and follow best practices for online security, such as avoiding suspicious downloads and using strong passwords.

Can I Trust Avast with My Personal Data?​

Avast has faced scrutiny in the past regarding its handling of user data, which has raised concerns about trust. However, the company has taken steps to address these concerns and improve its data protection practices. Avast has implemented robust security measures to safeguard user data, including encryption, secure storage, and access controls.

Users should still exercise caution when sharing personal data with any company, including Avast. It is essential to review Avast’s privacy policies and understand how the company collects, uses, and protects user data. By being informed and taking control of their data, users can make an educated decision about trusting Avast with their personal information.

Is Avast Free Version Enough for My Needs?​

Avast’s free version offers robust antivirus protection and is suitable for many users’ needs. The free version includes features such as malware detection, real-time protection, and Wi-Fi scanning. However, it lacks some advanced features, such as password management, firewall protection, and anti-ransomware protection, which are available in Avast’s paid versions.

Users with basic security needs, such as protecting against common malware and viruses, may find the free version sufficient. However, those who require more comprehensive protection, such as gamers, businesses, or users who handle sensitive data, may need to upgrade to a paid version to access additional features and enhanced security.
Nothing new, this information is out there for long.
Since its a Gen Digipuke company i would stay away from it.
 

andytan

Level 1
May 10, 2024
28

Unmasking Avast: Is it a US Company?​

November 13, 2024 by Brad Williams
In the realm of cybersecurity, few names are as recognizable as Avast. With a user base spanning millions worldwide, Avast has established itself as a leading provider of antivirus software and other security solutions. However, despite its global presence, there’s a lingering question about Avast’s origins and ownership: Is Avast a US company? In this article, we’ll delve into the history of Avast, its current structure, and the implications of its ownership to provide a comprehensive answer.

I'm fairly certain these are articles pumped out by an AI writing tool so take anything included with caution.

Unless Brad really does enjoy writing about 60+ topics a day. Based on the dates published this website averaged 131+ pieces per day since September 2024...
 

Jonny Quest

Level 24
Verified
Top Poster
Well-known
Mar 2, 2023
1,370

Unmasking Avast: Is it a US Company?​

November 13, 2024 by Brad Williams
In the realm of cybersecurity, few names are as recognizable as Avast. With a user base spanning millions worldwide, Avast has established itself as a leading provider of antivirus software and other security solutions. However, despite its global presence, there’s a lingering question about Avast’s origins and ownership: Is Avast a US company? In this article, we’ll delve into the history of Avast, its current structure, and the implications of its ownership to provide a comprehensive answer.
Table of Contents

And if we wanted to include another topic, would be this from March 2025. But, Avast paid wasn't part of this Comparative test?

Take Back Control: How to Stop Avast from Collecting Your Data​

 

IceMan7

Level 3
Mar 19, 2025
140
Eset LiveGuard...hmmm
A very good and interesting function that additionally protects us from threats. A suspicious file is blocked and then sent to the cloud for analysis.

Today, with friends over a beer and chips, we were thinking about LiveGuard in terms of privacy. However, we send files to the cloud. Eset is certainly private, but these days.... Avast was also supposed to be private before the scandal broke out.
In Eset settings, there is of course the option to disable files and folders so that LiveGuard does not send them to the cloud.

But what about files that we save on a regular basis on the computer. Any sensitive data, PDFs or photos (for example, a photo of my woman's bare breasts)? Eset will decide that the file is suspicious and tadaaam - it went to the cloud

What do you think about it? On the one hand, this technology increases security, but on the other hand it reduces privacy.
Here is more about privacy Eset LiveGuard


For example, this is what Bitdefender writes on its website when it comes to their cloud protection
The Global Protective Network
Scanning is mainly done in the cloud, so the impact on local resources is virtually zero. This means that the speed and performance of your system remains intact. And your files are always fully protected: Bitdefender does not scan the contents of your files itself and never uploads or stores them in the cloud.



I don't know how Kaspersky cloud protection works. Closer to BD or Eset?
 

SeriousHoax

Level 51
Verified
Top Poster
Well-known
Mar 16, 2019
4,036
Eset LiveGuard...hmmm
A very good and interesting function that additionally protects us from threats. A suspicious file is blocked and then sent to the cloud for analysis.
Every product sends files to the cloud, so it's nothing new. Microsoft, Kaspersky, Bitdefender, Avast, everyone. Honestly ESET's LiveGuard equivalent protection has been in Avast free for many users and its name is, CyberCapture. Now which is more effective I can't tell. CyberCapture has always been very average, LiveGuard isn't spectacular either.
Any sensitive data, PDFs or photos (for example, a photo of my woman's bare breasts)? Eset will decide that the file is suspicious and tadaaam - it went to the cloud
Well, this is something NSA used to do, and their employees passed around such photos among collogues before Edward Snowden exposed them. It's probably harder nowadays due to end-to-end encryption (not default in all platforms).
ESET don't send any documents files like PDF to the cloud, suspicious or not. Users have to manually enable that if they want.
ESET logs every single file sent to them which you can see in the GUI. It also has an option to enable desktop notification every time a file is sent.
Before Norton became Avast, they used to log everything too in even in more details.

Anyway, in the end you just have to trust whatever product you use. Don't trust = Don't use.
 

IceMan7

Level 3
Mar 19, 2025
140
What?? How does this become a topic of conversation with friends. :) You work in cybersecurity field?
Hahaha.
You see, sometimes we come to different topics. It started with the NATO situation, what's happening between the EU and Ukraine, and then... it moved on to password manager - should I continue using Keepass or maybe a cloud one. And so, when we entered the cloud, that's when it started :D

Every product sends files to the cloud, so it's nothing new. Microsoft, Kaspersky, Bitdefender, Avast, everyone. Honestly ESET's LiveGuard equivalent protection has been in Avast free for many users and its name is, CyberCapture. Now which is more effective I can't tell. CyberCapture has always been very average, LiveGuard isn't spectacular either.
Still, it's always an extra layer of protection. Moreover, the cloud does the calculations, not the computer, so there is less load on the unit. It's better that Avast and Eset have such a solution than not having it at all.

ESET don't send any documents files like PDF to the cloud, suspicious or not. Users have to manually enable that if they want.
ESET logs every single file sent to them which you can see in the GUI. It also has an option to enable desktop notification every time a file is sent.
Cool. I wrote that you can set Eset settings not to send documents to the cloud. There is such an option. The same, you can exclude folders that are to be bypassed by Eset LiveGuard.
Except that when you browse the Internet in a browser, create folders, documents, photos, presentations, etc., you don't have it blocked and if Eset considers a file "dangerous" - tick, it goes to the cloud.
Sure, you can check in events what went to the cloud. But after the fact, because it went.

Eset sends files to the cloud to scan them in its sandbox on the Azure platform (Microsoft)
However, as I pasted a fragment, BD does not send files.
Bitdefender does not scan the contents of your files itself and never uploads or stores them in the cloud
How does it work for them? Do they send a hash, a code? What is it? Especially since they do behavioral protection locally on the computer on which they are installed.

I don't know how the Kaspersky cloud works at all. Does it send a file for analysis, like Eset?
Anyway, in the end you just have to trust whatever product you use. Don't trust = Don't use.
Today, after so many scandals, I don't believe anyone. And I don't trust anyone. But if I approached it that way, I would have to stop using my computer or phone and disconnect from the internet.
Today, the only thing we want to do is limit this "spying", because spying is and will be.

Before Norton became Avast, they used to log everything too in even in more details.
An American company took over a Czech company. Are they going in the Avast direction? I don't believe it. Norton probably still does it and Avast will be more similar to Norton.
 
Last edited:

IceMan7

Level 3
Mar 19, 2025
140
I don't deny that Norton is not an Avast clone. But in terms of privacy, it will be closer to its own direction, not Avast. It's the USA and they can't do otherwise.
 

BJ Security

Level 1
Apr 4, 2025
14
In this video, we compare 8 paid antivirus programs.
The aim is to see how effective they are, and rank them from worst to best.

Please note:

- the antiviruses are already ranked in the video, I've taken into account Web blocking, the reaction to an attack, my malware pack and how the antivirus will defend itself.
- Please be courteous and respect my ranking. Filming took over 9 hours and 2 hours of preparation.
- the winning antivirus goes straight to the final, episode 4.
- A 3rd part has been added with enterprise antivirus, delaying the video schedule.
- all antivirus are default, I've only activated IF NECESSARY some options that the editor hasn't activated (heuristics, PUP detection etc.)
- the protocol is the same.




K7 Ultimate is an Indian antivirus that is beginning to make a name for itself.
The interface has evolved and welcomes us with a beautiful blue, which I like, the interface looks new while the old one was starting to date ...

Web: 10/10 , K7 blocks all malicious links.

Crack: 1/1 , blocked by K7

Pack : 33 out of 215 . K7 has improved a lot on behavioral blocking (the MAT effect?) but still lags behind on more direct attacks like scripts or other injectors...
In the end, an infection drops random files into Document. K7 deletes them, but this creates a loop.
Too bad, it's in 8th place.

Trend Micro is a well-known Japanese antivirus, especially in the corporate and school sectors.
For a long time now, Trend has been providing a fully automatic, 100% Cloud solution.
It's suitable for novices because... you can't configure anything! (but I've customized its interface, Japan obliges :D )

Web: 10/10 , Trend blocks all links!

Crack: Trend says it doesn't know the file and recommends deleting it, which I do. 1/1

Pack: Remains 18 out of 215 . Trend continues its efforts to detect malware, but still relies too much on its reputation system. It's good because it prevents executions, but it doesn't give any information other than to delete.
In the end, 2 scripts pass without reaction.
It ranks 7th. Despite good performance, relying too much on reputation and providing no information can annoy people.

ZoneAlarm is an Israeli company formerly known for its famous firewall.
Previously using Kaspersky, it now uses Sophos in addition to its own Cloud engine.
It's also the longest, taking around 40 minutes to install! (because ZA wanted to install 6 Microsoft programs.... )

Web: ZoneAlarm's Web protection is very poor. It's called Anti-Bot and only reacted twice.
But it intercepted all downloads! (9/9)
On the other hand, it analyzes by emulating the file, which is relatively time-consuming...

Crack: ZoneAlarm blocks installation. 1/1

Pack: Remains 17 out of 215. Zone is quick to scan, but takes a very long time to clean up, taking exactly 1 hour!
Because ZoneAlarm bombards with alerts, doing 1 after the other...
At launch, ZoneAlarm reacts rather late, but ends up destroying the installation attempts. In the end, only one script remains active.
It's in 6th place, so a little reactivity would be in order!

Emsisoft is undoubtedly one of the best-known anti-malware products.
Formerly a-Squared and running under IKARUS, Emsisoft adopted the Bitdefender engine several years ago.
However, the installation system has been modified. You need to create a comtpe and then download the software. The license will be added to an online account. A bit like Sophos or Bitdefender…

Web : 9/9 . Emsisoft blocks all links, one link is dead.

Crack: 1/1 . Blocked by the Emsisoft Cloud.

Pack: 15 left out of 215.
At first, I was very scared... not seeing Emsisoft react.
Then, the antivirus started to react and sweep away the attacks one after the other. A lack of reactivity is noted.
The machine is back to normal, but Emsisoft still needs to work on its reactivity.

Kaspersky is a Russian antivirus company widely known and respected in the security world.
In this version, I opt for the Plus version, which includes everything you need to be protected.
I've had to create exceptions for ProcessHacker, which doesn't like it...

Web : 9/9 . Kaspersky blocked everything, one link died.

Crack: Kaspersky detects malicious behavior and deletes the file. 1/1

Pack: Remains 9 out of 215. Excellent responsiveness from Kaspersky, even blocking files I launch!
But LummaStealer gets the better of Kaspersky and doesn't react.
It's a shame.

Formerly a hated antivirus like Norton, McAfee made a big comeback last year by completely redeveloping their application.
Gone is the heavy McAfee, and in comes the new McAfee, lightweight and entirely cloud-based!
And it's paying off! It's much lighter.
I've agreed to install McAfee WebAdvisor.

Web: 9/9, McAfee blocks all links. Only one is dead.

Crack: McAfee blocks installation. 1/1

Pack: Remains 8 out of 215.
McAfee surprised me a lot, because it has really improved its engine and finally knows how to defend itself properly!
It's not always reactive to scripts, which takes it out of 2nd place, but it does block payload downloads.
A little effort on scripts, but it's heading in the right direction!

Bitdefender, often Kaspersky's competitor, is a well-known Romanian antivirus.
The software retains its reputation, while boasting a polished interface.
I've activated Ransomware remediation and protection against crypto-jacking.

Web: 9/9, Bitdefender blocks all links. A slight slowdown was noted.

Crack: 1/1, Bitdefender blocks the dropper.

Pack: Remains 10 out of 215. Bitdefender shines and starts blocking the malware I'm running. It almost fell for Tank's fake game because PowerShell commands were in progress, but Bitdefender didn't let itself be fooled!
Only 1 piece of malware remains at the end, but Bitdefender cuts off its connection to the server.

ESET is a Slovakian antivirus, much appreciated by gamers for its lightness.
It's also a highly configurable antivirus!
Personally, I leave it at default.

Web: 10/10, ESET has blocked all links at source.

Crack: 1/1, ESET has blocked all installations.

Pack: 12 out of 215.
During runtime, Eset noticed a LummaStealer attack, impressive because the malware was unknown! In fact, it detected the pattern during launch.
On another piece of malware attempting to install itself, here ESET uses LiveGird to block the installation and remove the threat.
Congratulations, Eset is finally improving its Cloud network!
The machine is now infection-free, and deserves its 1st place.

Winner : Eset

Thank you for testing the effectiveness of all paid anti-viruses. 🙂

In my opinion, I think Kaspersky and Bitdefender are better than ESET because:

In Kaspersky:
- It has more granular and comprehensive features.
- It has a lowest false positives than ESET.
- It has "Behavioral Blocker" that monitors, and then blocks any suspicious activity.
- It heavily relies on "Advanced Disfection technology" to stop, and then remove Malware from your system.
- It has a "System Watcher", a unique feature in Kaspersky ( no other AVs have that feature ) that protects from Ransomware or Cryptojacking, but it can also detect and block even unknown or fileless attacks. Even if you get hit by an Ransomware, Cryptojacking, or any attacks, it will rollback actions performed by Malware to prevent the damage. It is available in all plans including Kaspersky Free ( something that the Free version of Bitdefender miss ).

All plans from Kaspersky has a Free trial you could try it for 30 days.



In Bitdefender:
- It has Autopilot feature that's fully automated.
- It has robust protection features like "Bitdefender Shield", "Advanced Threat Defense", "Online Threat Prevention", and more. All of these, provides better detection against threats like malware, ransomware. phishihg, or scams.
- It can possibly detect and block even unknown or fileless attacks ( like Kaspersky does ) that ESET couldn't.

All plans ( except the "Ultimate Security" edition ) from Bitdefender has a Free trial you could try it for 30 days.



Overall, I like your video. Thank god, ESET won. 👏

Although, ESET could be better at preventing unknown or fileless attacks ( as I have ever seen a video called "Best Antivirus VS. Unknown Ransomware II", at "The PC Security Channel", where ESET did not detect and block unknown ransomware. Remember, Unknown Ransomware is basically "Unknown Malware", why is ESET not able to detect and block that? 🤨), Kaspersky or Bitdefender would be better because, both of these AVs are top-tier that does outperform ESET, when it comes to protection against, major threats like unknown malwares or fileless attacks.

Anyway, thank you Shadowra, for testing these paid antiviruses. 😉
 

Khushal

Level 2
Apr 4, 2024
94
Thank you for testing the effectiveness of all paid anti-viruses. 🙂

In my opinion, I think Kaspersky and Bitdefender are better than ESET because:

In Kaspersky:
- It has more granular and comprehensive features.
- It has a lowest false positives than ESET.
- It has "Behavioral Blocker" that monitors, and then blocks any suspicious activity.
- It heavily relies on "Advanced Disfection technology" to stop, and then remove Malware from your system.
- It has a "System Watcher", a unique feature in Kaspersky ( no other AVs have that feature ) that protects from Ransomware or Cryptojacking, but it can also detect and block even unknown or fileless attacks. Even if you get hit by an Ransomware, Cryptojacking, or any attacks, it will rollback actions performed by Malware to prevent the damage. It is available in all plans including Kaspersky Free ( something that the Free version of Bitdefender miss ).

All plans from Kaspersky has a Free trial you could try it for 30 days.



In Bitdefender:
- It has Autopilot feature that's fully automated.
- It has robust protection features like "Bitdefender Shield", "Advanced Threat Defense", "Online Threat Prevention", and more. All of these, provides better detection against threats like malware, ransomware. phishihg, or scams.
- It can possibly detect and block even unknown or fileless attacks ( like Kaspersky does ) that ESET couldn't.

All plans ( except the "Ultimate Security" edition ) from Bitdefender has a Free trial you could try it for 30 days.



Overall, I like your video. Thank god, ESET won. 👏

Although, ESET could be better at preventing unknown or fileless attacks ( as I have ever seen a video called "Best Antivirus VS. Unknown Ransomware II", at "The PC Security Channel", where ESET did not detect and block unknown ransomware. Remember, Unknown Ransomware is basically "Unknown Malware", why is ESET not able to detect and block that? 🤨), Kaspersky or Bitdefender would be better because, both of these AVs are top-tier that does outperform ESET, when it comes to protection against, major threats like unknown malwares or fileless attacks.

Anyway, thank you Shadowra, for testing these paid antiviruses. 😉
agreed obviously giving eset the crown is misleading.
As far as kaspersky missing lumma stealer it possibly never didn't actually happen. First of all the malware supposedly missed in the video is cryptbot and what is interesting about this botnet is that it is VM aware and it checks first of all what processes are running in the system by sending a HTTP request. It then idles if it detects VM or an AV like Kaspersky and basically does nothing and a simple restart will remove all its traces. It would have been interesting to look what application control or intrusion detection control had to say about the file whether the http post did take place or not in the first place. Because if it fails to get an HTTPS post then also it sleeps indefinitely. following is the VT link and u can look up sandbox reports. It is important to note that instead of infostealing it injects and downloads more malware (as evident by few virustotal detections pointing to same as well). One of those payloads could be lumma or someother stealer.

 

About us

  • MalwareTips is a community-driven platform providing the latest information and resources on malware and cyber threats. Our team of experienced professionals and passionate volunteers work to keep the internet safe and secure. We provide accurate, up-to-date information and strive to build a strong and supportive community dedicated to cybersecurity.

User Menu

Follow us

Follow us on Facebook or Twitter to know first about the latest cybersecurity incidents and malware threats.

Top