Whoo, that map is not from the last century, it's from the last millennium.....
But I don't know if you can rely on Googles and the Internet in general for information...
I also found flags:
Shadowra's Big Comparative - Episode 1 : Free Antivirus
- Thread starter Shadowra
- Start date
It is advised to take all reviews with a grain of salt. In extreme cases some reviews use dramatization for entertainment purposes.
But I don't know if you can rely on Googles and the Internet in general for information...
I also found flags:
- Jul 14, 2015
- 796
Asked that too , but will see how Bitdefender paid will do in his test, BD free isn't that much difference with the paid, besides a few more layers and firewall.
annaegorov
Level 2
- Feb 6, 2018
- 41
I'm lost.Oh ok sorry sir.Kindly confirm if this post ( current one ) it's okay or not? ( With multiple post's reply in one post )
This is for your information.
This is becoming complicated.
When I think of spam......... I think of me making 20-30 comments like this XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
On each one, with no other text?
It's true, Eset is lighter in web browsing and maybe other things, I just tried ESET but I didn't like it, everything was fine in the browsing speed, but I felt that the system startup was a little slow for a few seconds, when trying Accessing a file through the context menu increased the CPU, it was really bothering me, I also experienced failures in web protection, I used openphish to obtain URL samples, ESET blocked some and not others even though In Virustotal it marked Phishing detection, I checked the protection log and there it said that it had blocked the threat but in the browser the page had loaded completely, I returned to Kaspersky, I will not change again, I had a very bad experience with ESET.
Inf: Tested on a low-resource computer (Incompatible) with Windows 11 23h2
Browser used for testing:
Microsoft Edge
In performance it is fine, I had problems with the web protection in ESET, Kaspersky in performance is also fine, the only drawback for me is in web browsing, it slows down browsing..., otherwise it is fine, I did not experience any failures with Kaspersky , solid product.
You can reply to multiple posts with just a single post, rather than creating a new post for every reply.
ESET's performance is good (less RAM memory consumption, it doesn't slow down web browsing, something that Kaspersky does) and Kaspersky's performance is also good, although it consumes a little more RAM and slows down browsing a bit.
Total Ram consumption with both products (Computer with 4GB of RAM)
Kaspersky: 35/38%(sometimes 39/40-1%, then returns to the first values described)
ESET : 32/35%
*(Additional)
I experienced errors with ESET (Web Protection)
I didn't have any problems with Kaspersky.
I hope I have helped you by telling you my personal experience.
- Jun 18, 2022
- 449
I didn't face any slow system startup issue or failure in web protection also didn't face slow browsing.
After Kaspersky use, it does slow browsing speed or use high system resources?
- Jan 13, 2019
- 232
Do you know any tweaks to improve Kaspersky's impact?
- May 7, 2016
- 1,481
Kaspersky is light if you disable web injection.
Eset is also light. Protection wise Both are good. Kaspersky is 20/20 and Eset 18/20.
- Jan 13, 2019
- 232
I tested Eset and it uses less than 100Mb RAM and performance is a little bit faster than Kaspersky. Except for the fast performance, I prefer Kaspersky. If any tweaks can improve Kaspersky to consume less RAM and faster performance?
- May 7, 2016
- 1,481
Disable Web injection, Gameing profile off. Disable consumption of startup resources & Disable background scan.
- Jan 13, 2019
- 232
Will disabling web injection and background scan leave vulnerability to my pc?
- Jun 18, 2022
- 449
Do you have any screenshot of these settings?
Same question.
I also think in terms of behaviour protection, Kaspersky performs better than ESET. Is that correct??
- May 7, 2016
- 1,481
Kaspersky Real time protection is very good.
It will not effect your protection in big way.
Background scan is useless for me atleast.
Post in thread 'Kaspersky\VPN\KSOS 21.19 & KES 12.7 betas' New Update - Kaspersky\VPN\KSOS 21.19 & KES 12.7 betas
At no point did I say that ESET slows down my web browsing...
Kaspersky reduces web browsing speed, system resources increase a little (CPU and RAM), but it is acceptable.
- Dec 10, 2022
- 481
Been testing symantec endpoint free unmanaged client with settings set to all max and all i can say is whoa!!! For those wanting a good free solution use Symantec endpoint unmanaged client with the browser extension. Also no advertisements or any BS!
I do not recommend disabling web protection, it significantly reduces protection, disabling it will prevent Kaspersky from blocking malicious URLs.
I share your evaluation based on my personal experience in the past. But I would say ESET 16-17/20, today I have not tested ESET in depth, but a while ago I used to use it and it was very common to get infected, at that time the only weakness of Kaspersky that I experienced was the USB protection, i infected me with viruses worms..., System Watcher detected the threat, disinfected the computer but there was havoc..., and also problems with web hijackers..., but that was years ago (2016/2017) both have improved a lot since then, but ESET still doesn't convince me in terms of protection...
