If I'm a 'user who can't use Windows 10 for some reason', consider alternatives like Linux.What i don't understand is this. Ok, i am not connecting to the web right now, but what bugs me is: This is a security forum, with a malware hub no less. In all other sectors, people make comparisons. How come nobody, instead of stating his opinions or ad hominem arguments (Ad hominem - Wikipedia), while at the same time asks not to mind the words of the speech, didn't ask to do, for the sake of the AVERAGE JOE (!!!) , who can't upgrade to Windows 10 for one or the other reason , a test, and recommend, IF POSSIBLE, IF IT EXISTS, some configuration, that is let's say roughly on par with Windows 10 + WD, which is what the "average Joe" would use with Windows 10 out of the box, so that the poor Windows 7 user that has unsupported hardware or no Windows 10 license or no will, can stay reasonably safe?
You don't want that? Make a big sticky with capital letters "ADVICE TO AVERAGE JOE NOW THAT Windows 7 IS EOL".
Instead you have this happening...
I am also a member of Avenger Joe. Joe may take the word 'dangerous but safe' as 'safe' because he tends to interpret it in his favor.
In Japan, there is a dish that eats poisonous fish raw. Although cooked by a qualified cook is safe, Avenger Joe imitates the cook and produces several fatalities each year.
I feel that the difference between a quarrel and a debate should be calm and understood. Opposition can lead to revitalization, but personal attacks have no productivity. I have experienced in this forum that many different opinions are sources of my thinking. Opposition is not hostility.