It is kind of a work in progress. It is completely functional and pretty much bug free, but we are just trying to decide on which direction we are going to go with it.
You opened this thread in August 2021, seems you are taking your time to make up your mind.
I have a suggestion for you, inspired by the profiles and dynamic security postures you have mentioned in other threads on MT and CS.
- DUI-Pro starts up with recommended profile
- When a proces starts in USER FOLDERS which is NOT considered SAFE by the CL-light AI engine, it will
a) postpone that process (I noticed in the past that Kaspersky's system watcher turned processes grey in Process Explorer to wait for the KSN-cloud verdict).
b) switches on to aggressive profile (when in DUI-Pro is in AUTO mode) or
c) switches to interactive profile (when in DUI-Pro is in MANUAL mode) or
d) switches to custom profile (when DUI-Pro has a custom profile and is in CUSTOM mode) and
e) allows that process to run and leave the decision over to Microsoft Defender with one of the three above selected profiles.
- After a user determined time (e.g. 5 minutes) DUI-Pro shifts back to recommended profile.
Cyberlock and DUI-pro share your idea of AI-based dynamic security postures (added protection when you are at risk is a Unique Selling Point and breakthrough idea IMO)
Differences of CyberLock with DUI-pro:
- CL monitors your whole system, whereas DUI-pro only monitors executions in user folders
- CL automatically enables a hard lock (with small local whitelist), whereas DUI-pro enables Defender's soft lock (with gigantic cloud whitelist, increasing the false negatives risk)
- CL uses immediate ML/AI decisions, where as Defender uses delayed ML/AI (even with block at first sight and zero tolerance on, it blocks signed malware after cloud analysis)
In layman's terms CyberLock protects the individual, while Microsoft Defender's 'zero tolerance' cloud AI in reality protects the herd.
- CL instantly switches Lock ON and OFF without delay while DUI-pro postpones (delays) the suspicious process and switches back to recommended after some time has passed
- CL has additional security features (smarter whitelisting, sandboxing, exploit protection, etc).
Looking at the sales success of mobile phone apps, I am wondering why software developers don't use this idea of micro licensing fee's (10 million x 1 dollar is also 10 million dollar income).
Because this might be a to much forward thinking idea, I would not suggest to apply micro licensing, but use a friendly yearly license of 5 or 10 dollars annual.