I know, when I saw that they recommended Yahoo! and PC Mag, I was like: what?

I'm stuck between ESET or Kaspersky, I like both but I'm just afraid to test them out lol. I have heard that Kaspersky doesn't fully protect a 64-bit system anyway.
Both of these products are very good, excellent protection, and light on the system "once loaded". KIS used to be a heavy weight champion in its day, but has become much lighter. KIS will impact your system load times especially from a cold boot, once the system is fully loaded though, it is extremely light. Eset has for the most part always been light, although this really depends on the users system, as I have seen some post from certain users claiming they have longer start times ect using Eset now. I am using Eset myself and on my system, it is just as light as windows default security, and does not hamper my workloads in any way,shape or form.
As far as detection/prevention go, all suites on default settings are weaker then if the user took time to learn the modules and tweaked some of the settings. As for these two options listed above, both are relatively strong out of the box though.
I could just give you a straight opinion "of course it would be my own, with my uses, on my system" and would not reflect how this would be for you, and why I stated it is best for you to test drive them on your system and see personally.