New Update Hawk Eye Website Analysis Showcase

[EASTER]

 

[Trident]

A new version has been pushed.

Improved popup UI

\

Implemented Deep Scan to rescan trusted websites

Improved performance, stability and reduced false positives under some conditions

https://download.hea-p.com/downloadExtension

 

[Zero Knowledge]

You deserve credit for coming up with good Windows tools for free, I'll have to fire up a VM and give her a go. Anything I need to configure or do before I start?

 

[rashmi]

https://download.hea-p.com/downloadExtension

I tried the "Heat" extension with Chrome. Check if the extension page displays an "error" tab, which lists "content security violation" or a similar error after a while or after some browsing.

Update: The error appears when you click the extension in the toolbar.

 

[Trident]

I tried the "Heat" extension with Chrome. Check if the extension page displays an "error" tab, which lists "content security violation" or a similar error after a while or after some browsing.

Update: The error appears when you click the extension in the toolbar.

Yes, inline styles need to be allowed in manifest.json. It is a minor error which is fixed in 2.9.

 

[EASTER]

 

[bjm_]

 

[Trident]

View attachment 293314

You've attempted to open httpS://<website.com>. The generic heuristic targets http websites that lack the necessary security protocol.

 

[bjm_]

You've attempted to open httpS://<website.com>. The generic heuristic targets http websites that lack the necessary security protocol.

Okay...I thought I pasted 1000-mbest.com. Whatever I did. I can't reproduce.

 

[Trident]

 

[EASTER]

 

[LinuxFan58]

Could one of the testers run Speedometer 3.1 with and without this extension enabled?

 

[bjm_]

Could one of the testers run Speedometer 3.1 with and without this extension enabled?

 

[Trident]

with:

Without:

 

[EASTER]

 

[LinuxFan58]

@bjm_ and @Trident

Could you also post the specs of your PC (and GPU) and WIFI speeds?
Speedometer 3.1 is influenced by Javascript performance and also WIFI speeds (besides javascript performance).

The results of @bjm_ are good, the results of @Trident surprising

Thanks for posting

 

[Trident]

@bjm_ and @Trident

Could you also post the specs of your PC (and GPU) and WIFI speeds?
Speedometer 3.1 is influenced by Javascript performance and also WIFI speeds (besides javascript performance).

The results of @bjm_ are good, the results of @Trident surprising

Thanks for posting

• CPU Cores: 4
• Threads: 8
• Base Frequency:
  2.40
  GHz (with configurable TDP-up)
• Max Turbo Frequency:
  4.20
  GHz
• Architecture: Tiger Lake UP3
• Lithography: 10 nm SuperFin
• Integrated Graphics: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80EU)

16GB RAM
1124 mbps (average) connection speed

 

[Sampei.Nihira]

Could one of the testers run Speedometer 3.1 with and without this extension enabled?

Also check before/after DOMContentLoaded on a heavy website, which in simple terms is when the HTML has been loaded and the website becomes usable:

 

[Trident]

Also check before/after DOMContentLoaded on a heavy website, which in simple terms is when the HTML has been loaded and the website becomes usable:

View attachment 293415

The extension will not affect severely the dom loading times and speed

 

[Sampei.Nihira]

The extension will not affect severely the dom loading times and speed

Your extension, perhaps.
But extensions usually have an impact.
Coincidentally, DCL is also a parameter measured by Speedometer 3.1.
You can ask the AI or check this old test:

Chrome Extension Performance Lookup