- Aug 30, 2015
- 1,928
Based on your opinions and reasoning which is the better product.
I will still be using both products regardless of the votes.
I will still be using both products regardless of the votes.
In my System conf:
Zemana detection rate in real time it's better.
- Resource Usage: Both.
- Real World System Impact: Zemana.
- User Friendliness: Both.
- User Interface: Zemana.
- Level of Protection and Features: Zemana have 0-day (pandora) engine, and Malwarebytes web blocker. IMO Zemana.
- Overall Winner: Zemana.
Malwarebytes it's better deleting corpses.
ZAM is not a HMP clone. It started off like that and changed over time.i voted malwarebytes.
malwarebytes is an original product & works offline.
zemana is a hitmanpro rip off just like watchdog is & it is no good offline.
The reply was deleted because its not the appropriate section. You can use the appropriate sub forum for zemana to raise the issue and tag op if you want. Thank you for understanding and for listing the reason why you chose one option from original pollI have both and I would go with MBAM as Zemana just missed a trojan on my end that has been known since October of 2015. I want to apologize to the OP who was robbed of my deleted post on this... My original reply was even more helpful and insightful than this current reply. I am sorry this reply had to be watered down.
The reply was deleted because its not the appropriate section. You can use the appropriate sub forum for zemana to raise the issue and tag op if you want. Thank you for understanding and for listing the reason why you chose one option from original poll
sorry but in regards to signatures and detection for a specific file, this is not the section. I have recreated your post and tagged relevant users. please provide info/continue discussion on Zemana possible miss on infectionI appreciate your reply, I truly do, but I respectfully disagree. I felt it was very relevant. I say this because Zemana uses Avira as one of it's components. To that I merely said Avira by itself detected the trojan yet Zemana with Avira did not. I am sorry, but I don't see that as not being appropriate, if anything it brought up an interesting point IMO. A point that could help the OP make a decision.