- May 31, 2017
- 1,719
- Content source
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LMxOPv-RWdU
I tested every (and I mean every) zero-trust / deny-by-default product against Follina, and they all failed, except VS.Seeing I don't have the patience to even sit through a 4 minute video, I just don't like watching anything on my computer, can someone summarize please?
Isnt this a bit like " We from Mercedes advise you to drive Mercedes ? " You are from Voodoo shield, i understand you advise your own product.I tested every (and I mean every) zero-trust / deny-by-default product against Follina, and they all failed, except VS.
I think it's an unfortunate comparison. There were a lot of problems with VoodooShield, DefenderUI Free and Pro and Dan solved them as soon as possible.Isnt this a bit like " We from Mercedes advise you to drive Mercedes ? " You are from Voodoo shield, i understand you advise your own product.
Untill we / me / i see any proof of other products fail.... well ......
I think it's good marketing to show the strength of your product. And I don't have any doubts about the excellence of Voodooshield. But it's not good practice to show what you perceive as the weaknesses or failures of your fellow developers and competitors. You're biased, it helps hackers, and it doesn't enhance the ethical reputation of your company.
Why if you show what is good compared to other competitors is unethical? Do we always want to have a globalist vision?I think it's good marketing to show the strength of your product. And I don't have any doubts about the excellence of Voodooshield. But it's not good practice to show what you perceive as the weaknesses or failures of your fellow developers and competitors. You're biased, it helps hackers, and it doesn't enhance the ethical reputation of your company.
Please feel free to test for yourself. There are tons of POC's on GitHub, just search for Follina.Isnt this a bit like " We from Mercedes advise you to drive Mercedes ? " You are from Voodoo shield, i understand you advise your own product.
Untill we / me / i see any proof of other products fail.... well ......
Thank you, I appreciate that! When I first read about Follina, I was quite sure that VS would have no issues blocking this attack. But the really cool thing was that I also knew it would confirm my suspicions either way that the companies who adopted my anti-exploit method did not implement it properly.I'm not surprised about Voodooshield, this software is just awesome.
Not for nothing I love it (I also have a lifetime license ^^)
No need, not interested to test anything anymore.Please feel free to test for yourself. There are tons of POC's on GitHub, just search for Follina.
All cybersecurity products are always tested with Default settings. I showed the OSA profile, I wish I would have remembered to show the HC settings as well.I watched it twice and tbh I just found it lacks information. You got HC and OSarmor installed (no mentioning the settings used). At least please make it a three part comparison and mention with which settings you are testing (for each HC and OSA).
As far as I understand it even SWH should block Follina and HC got a lot more options than SWH
Q&A - Simple Windows Hardening Post 518
Since I use VS and HC on different pcs I consider myself biased for both
@Andy Ful Statement?SWH had the same result as HC
Isnt this a bit like " We from Mercedes advise you to drive Mercedes ? " You are from Voodoo shield, i understand you advise your own product.
Untill we / me / i see any proof of other products fail.... well ......
I only showed products in the video that publicly claimed to have stopped Follina on day zero. Once again, people were speculating without properly testing, and it is important to me that everyone knows the truth so they can be properly protected.I think it's good marketing to show the strength of your product. And I don't have any doubts about the excellence of Voodooshield. But it's not good practice to show what you perceive as the weaknesses or failures of your fellow developers and competitors. You're biased, it helps hackers, and it doesn't enhance the ethical reputation of your company.
There really is nothing to talk about. People can test for themselves.*Getting popcorn*
I forsee a lot of Andy / Dan posts again