- Dec 21, 2017
- 478
Should I wait before building my new PC to put a core i9-10900K?
What is the expected price for core i9 10900K
What is the expected price for core i9 10900K
Why not AMD Ryzen 9?Should I wait before building my new PC to put a core i9-10900K?
What is the expected price for core i9 10900K
I really wanted to go with Ryzen but I am going to do something that need Intel CPU for stability!
Are they going to change the architecture on core i9 10900K?Well, AMD CPU's are just as stable as Intel CPU's... And when you come to ask this to security oriented forum, I must say that Intel CPU's have architectural flaws that make them more vulnerable to hardware exploits than AMD. I would simply not buy Intel CPU until they have designed new architecture, and that might still take years before its out. I wouldn't want to buy Intel CPU just to see it getting lower performance overtime due to security patches and mitigations... This has been the trend for Intel CPU's based on Skylake core, and don't see it changing. Kaby Lake, Coffee Lake and even Whiskey Lake are all still based on same Skylake core, which itself is heavily based on previous Intel architectures dating back all the way to 2011 Sandy Bridge.
Nope. Its just another Skylake refresh by another name and probably on 14nm+++++++ or whatever Intel calls their outdated manufacturing process by now. AMD is on TSMC 7nm already, been there for almost a year by now...Are they going to change the architecture on core i9 10900K?
Well, AMD CPU's are just as stable as Intel CPU's... And when you come to ask this to security oriented forum, I must say that Intel CPU's have architectural flaws that make them more vulnerable to hardware exploits than AMD. I would simply not buy Intel CPU until they have designed new architecture, and that might still take years before its out. I wouldn't want to buy Intel CPU just to see it getting lower performance overtime due to security patches and mitigations... This has been the trend for Intel CPU's based on Skylake core, and don't see it changing. Kaby Lake, Coffee Lake and even Whiskey Lake are all still based on same Skylake core, which itself is heavily based on previous Intel architectures dating back all the way to 2011 Sandy Bridge.
Ryzen is a new architecture than Intel bleeding edge 14mm architecture. Give it couple years later then we will see Ryzen vulnerabilities.
I would wait for Ryzen 4000 series because AMD will going to reckon Intel 10th gen.
The i9 10900k is the i9 9900k with 2 more additional cores. Same bleeding edge 14mn architecture technology and vulnerabilities. The i9 9900k is already hot so adding 2 more additional cores bring it up to 10 cores total will going to make it runs hotter than i9 9900k.
The price of i9 10900k is going to be expensive so that will going to make you think twice do I want used Ryzen 9 3900x, 3950x, or i9 9900k or brand new Ryzen 4000 series. I definitely would go Ryzen 9 3900x if the price is the same as i9 9900k if you are looking for a budget cpu upgrade. The Ryzen 9 3900x at the moment is $470. When Ryzen 4000 series launch, it will be lower for 3900x and 3950x.
The i9 10900k is beating Ryzen 9 3900x in dollar per performance, but if you care performance per dollar than used 3900x or 3950x or Ryzen 4000 series.
To be fair, AMD does not even need to combat Intel's 10th (although ofc they will), because 3900X and especially 3950X are simply out of reach for Intel. 10 core Intel CPU or not.
14nm is not bleeding edge, don't care how many + you add there. 14nm is ancient by today's standards and shows just how far behind Intel is compared to TSMC these days.
The i9 10900k will beat 3900x.
14nm is on the bleeding edge.
Intel 14nm is on the bleeding edge. 5th gen, 6th gen, 7th gen, 8th gen, 9th gen, and now 10th gen. Intel try to hang onto the 14nm as long as possible and by the time Intel is going to 12 or 10nm, AMD will be on lower nanometer. Lower nanometer = better performance, higher efficiency, and better thermal. The i9 9900k speak from itself. The 10900k will going to be faster than i9 9900k for about 2% better in single core and 30% on multi core but you are going to need a better cooling to cool down the 10900k because it will runs hotter than 9900k. In addition, a new motherboard for the same 14nm architecture with a different chipset, and higher electricity bill because 10900k can sap more than 125Watts TDP. IPC from Intel 9th to 10th gen is not even great at all.
Should I wait before building my new PC to put a core i9-10900K?
What is the expected price for core i9 10900K