Battle Symantec Endpoint Unmanaged vs F-Secure Safe vs Comodo IS Free?

[gigi64]

Which one do you think will bring more security?
In terms of firewall?
In terms of antivirus?
And finally,
which one has less impact on the speed of Windows(Ran And Cpu Usage)

 

[Vitali Ortzi]

F-Secure with Windows built-in Firewall is enough. F-Secure is designed to work with the Windows Firewall.

Comodo Anti-virus has a low detection rate yet a high false positive rate. Comodo Firewall is good but can be incompatible with F-Secure.

Symantec Anti-virus has a high false positive rate and does a bad job in cloud protection. Likewise, its Firewall component is okay but can be incompatible with F-Secure.

True Symantec has a lot of false positives and a config change could lower it but still would be very high .
for a basic av I would recommend kaspersky or Eset
Between these eset has even lower false positives by default and kaspersky is stronger by default (kaspersky still has way lower false positives then defender especially among Gray soft )

 

[koloveli]

Comodo internet security in default is excellent...
antivirus is good;
auto-containment is also antilogger (protect use against spyware of type keylogger, screenlogger...);
You can installer the comodo secure shopping;
and is free...