Serious Discussion uBlock Origin Lite - General Discussions

[7Oz-64]

Having "request sent" for the three items does it pose a serious risk?

I don't think so, more privacy concern!!!

 

[Sampei.Nihira]

@Parkinsond
So if you're use UBOL, add DNR rules, the one provided by @Sampei.Nihira block all on my Marmaduke browser.
i can't found again the discussion about not block csp reports but i know there are some contreversial discussions

Yes, because csp_report is first-party in the case of the test.
AG team considers, for example, blocking only third-party csp_report.

 

[7Oz-64]

@Sampei.Nihira
some of your screenshot on 1 first page : "Block outsider intrusion into LAN", you don't activate-it ? specific reason ?

 

[Sampei.Nihira]

@Sampei.Nihira
some of your screenshot on 1 first page : "Block outsider intrusion into LAN", you don't activate-it ? specific reason ?

Because it was replaced via browser.

P.S.
If present and active.........................

 

[7Oz-64]

Because it was replaced via browser.

P.S.
If present and active.........................

local-network-access-check ?
uhm have to disable-it in ubol cause already activated this flag.
And using both ag and ubol (you're filters settings + AI widgets) give more privacy

 

[Sampei.Nihira]

local-network-access-check ?

I have 5 in Chrome:

List of Interesting Experimental Flags for Google Chrome to Try Out

P.S.

4 in Firefox.

 

[7Oz-64]

I have 5 in Chrome:

List of Interesting Experimental Flags for Google Chrome to Try Out

Yes me too, except split permissions (not present)

 

[7Oz-64]

@Sampei.Nihira
also have :
Anonymize local IPs exposed by WebRTC
Disable search engine collection
And all of yours

 

[Sampei.Nihira]

@Sampei.Nihira
also have :
Anonymize local IPs exposed by WebRTC
Disable search engine collection
And all of yours

The bold flag is useless because it is implemented by default.

P.S.

We try, if possible, to remain IT.

 

[7Oz-64]

The bold flag is useless because it is implemented by default.

P.S.

We try, if possible, to remain IT.

Sure, and as i don't have (don't want) the "fabulous chromewebstore" Handling of extension MIME type requests are set on prompt because i manually install and update extensions

 

[7Oz-64]

Sorry for Thread derivation

Back on UBOL

 

[Sampei.Nihira]

Sure, and as i don't have (don't want) the "fabulous chromewebstore" Handling of extension MIME type requests are set on prompt because i manually install and update extensions

Just think, it bothers me (relatively) not to get Firefox.signed.xpi because it's not available on GitHub...........

 

[7Oz-64]

Just think, it bothers me (relatively) not to get Firefox.signed.xpi because it's not available on GitHub...........

Not sure to understand well (you talk about firefox github extension not signed), but i grab extension via chromewebstore (sometimes several days after github publication) like that (for ubol) : hxxps://clients2.google.com/service/update2/crx?response=redirect&acceptformat=crx2,crx3&prodversion=144.0.7559.167&x=id%3Dddkjiahejlhfcafbddmgiahcphecmpfh%26installsource%3Dondemand%26uc

 

[Sampei.Nihira]

Non sono sicuro di aver capito bene (parli di un'estensione github di Firefox non firmata), ma io prendo l'estensione tramite chromewebstore (a volte diversi giorni dopo la pubblicazione su github) in questo modo (per ubol): hxxps://clients2.google.com/service/update2/crx?response=redirect&acceptformat=crx2,crx3&prodversion=144.0.7559.167&x=id%3Dddkjiahejlhfcafbddmgiahcphecmpfh%26installsource%3Dondemand%26uc