Battle Voodooshield vs Simple Windows Hardening

[Azazel]

How they in regard of protection against fileless malware, protection of lolbins compared to each other.
What are the major differences between them, pros and cons of each product?

 

[Andy Ful]

They cannot be directly compared.
You could probably compare:

• SWH + AV + SmartScreen with AV + VS
• SWH + Microsoft Defender (ConfigureDefender Max settings) with Microsoft Defender (default settings) + VS
• etc.

Generally, SWH assumes that you already applied strong protection for EXE and MSI files, so it is focused on the fileless attack vector. VS already includes strong protection for EXE and MSI files.
There are several technical differences, but these differences do not matter at home.
VS is more resistant to targeted attacks in businesses (uses kernel driver).
SWH is based on SRP which is not actively developed by Microsoft. It is probable that SRP will be removed from Windows 12.
SWH is a very simple tool - VS is currently a complex piece of software.

 

[oldschool]

How they in regard of protection against fileless malware, protection of lolbins compared to each other.
What are the major differences between them, pros and cons of each product?

The 2nd post is your first lesson from the master himself.

 

[jerzy601]

it makes no sense to compare the two programs .
both programs are very good but each of them works in different ways.
The master himself explains it best.
in the second post.