Please, consider that your criteria for good AV are not shared by all people. Believe me. Testing something for two hours, two days, or even two months is not convincing. You do not need anti-phishing and web protecting modules in AV, there are some other very good solutions. Detection rate is not important, because only the protection rate does matter (cloud dependent), except when you work offline. Personally, I do not think that Panda is the best AV for home users, but I cannot see the proof that it is below the average. Furthermore, the difference between the average and the best is very small.Is two hours i test again Panda dome advanced. I can not believe the persons to pay for this product. Web ptotection olmost zero . Phishing protection zero. Detection rate maybe is better without antivirus. Great delay if you download something. . Delay the aplications. The only good not use many ram and need only 125 mb disk space.
View attachment 212378
View attachment 212379