- Aug 2, 2015
- 4,286
Do you mean DA ? what the hell is DP ?thanks for the reply,yes I'm talking about DP and compatibility with VS is there any special setting to apply ? I have VS Pro and DP Beta
Do you mean DA ? what the hell is DP ?thanks for the reply,yes I'm talking about DP and compatibility with VS is there any special setting to apply ? I have VS Pro and DP Beta
There is nothing that is necessary to change in DeepArmor, within the install location you can view and edit the whitelist for DA butlol sorry yes I mean DA ^^ also I'm an advanced user
Yeah I set the advanced settings as max while I test it, I more had in mind to add it as a companion to otherMBAE is sad. Less sad than Malwarebytes Anti-Malware but still sad and not comparable to HMPA.
Didn't know MBAE is still under development under beta. They must be trying to gather concentrated feedback and testing on standalone to later benefit the MB package.In my quest for a fast and secure Sig-Free config I am testing running MBAE alongside HMPA
MBAE is still in development as a standalone, found here: MBAE 1.10 - Latest Standalone BETA
I had a key, but you don't need it seeing it allows for premium features seeing the "Standalone" is in perpetual beta.
It seems light and non conflicting with HMPA which is good and can be yet another tool for us Sig-Free adventurers.
** Changes are reflected in my Config. I will report here any issues. PeAcE
Yeah I agree, and I put to sleep VoodooShield for this, HMPA and VS play nice, so I figured "why not" and decidedDidn't know MBAE is still under development under beta. They must be trying to gather concentrated feedback and testing on standalone to later benefit the MB package.
Exploits are very uncommon to come across anyway. Having two anti-exploits may not cause any trouble in regular use.
However, one might not get a chance to evaluate how the two of them (HMPA and MBAE) function at that critical time due to the rare possibility of exploit occurrence on your system.
There are chances that two anti-exploits covering the same application(s) with say similar mitigation strategies can cause serious conflict during the crucial time and eventually cause user loss.
Cool! Sure there are higher chances of HMPA blocking the badman. Does the HMPA Beta that you've installed include Anti-malware feature now?Yeah I agree, and I put to sleep VoodooShield for this, HMPA and VS play nice, so I figured "why not" and decided
to try MBAE as well. I may clone this and look for a exploit to test on the clone and see if the protection falls apart,
but I have a sneaking suspicion that HMPA will arrest an exploit before MBAE makes a peep. I only want to try this because
even if it is half ass decent, it is a good addition or companion for those that like free companion apps of this caliber.
Thanks for the feedback brother
yes any exploit protection combined with HMPA is actually harmful.IIRC HMPA will prevent MBAE to inject dll to processes protected by HMPA
the only advantage I see is that MBAE is free
Isn't having HMPA more than enough? It should be much much better than MBAE, right?In my quest for a fast and secure Sig-Free config I am testing running MBAE alongside HMPA
MBAE is still in development as a standalone, found here: MBAE 1.10 - Latest Standalone BETA
I had a key, but you don't need it seeing it allows for premium features seeing the "Standalone" is in perpetual beta.
It seems light and non conflicting with HMPA which is good and can be yet another tool for us Sig-Free adventurers.
** Changes are reflected in my Config. I will report here any issues. PeAcE
So it's not sig-free anymoreMade some changes to my main Windows 10 drive, they are reflected within my security profile.
They are as follows.
Added:
GlassWire Pro 1.2.109 (LifeTime)
Sophos Home (Beta) 1.2.3 Premium
Removed:
Hitman Pro Alert Beta (Premium)
Hitman Pro Beta (Premium)
WFC (Windows Firewall Control) Premuim
Sophos Home "Beta" 1.2.3 is with HMPA & HMP built in, not sigbased version, still sig-free brotherSo it's not sig-free anymore
Actually it has sigs in plus the hmpa module. So sig and no sig together.Sophos Home "Beta" 1.2.3 is with HMPA & HMP built in, not sigbased version, still sig-free brother
So seeing Sophos sneaks in sigs I do have to change my Configuration titleActually it has sigs in plus the hmpa module. So sig and no sig together.
Yeah, even hmpa will have sigs soon on the cloud like intercept and the home beta. Nothing bad with that as long as they are not on your pc to waste resources. The higher the detection the better.So seeing Sophos sneaks in sigs I do have to change my Configuration title
Ok fixing it now @pablozi
Changed it to "Lite" config instead of "Sig-Free"