That post is silly. It reminds me of these Lock Picking Youtube 'exspurts' that claim to be able to pick unpickable locks. Then you watch them fail at it, endlessly. So they pull the lock out of the shroud, rip it apart, examine the key drops, then re-assemble it leaving the shroud off, toss it in a vice, then spend 3 straight days trying to pick it then claim victory under totally unrealistic circumstances that would never be repeated in the real world. You know, the real world where locks are in shrouds, on doors facing a street with unknown key valleys where you can't stand in front of a door for 3 days without attracting attention.
Cylance attracts these kinds of kids because Cylance makes claims, and youtube exspurts want to boast. But it's all really meaningless. At least that guy admitted Cylance is 'tough' and tends to snag their secret sauce magical tools that don't show up on Virustotal.
Depending on the advanced attack, every AV or security product might fail. That's not saying much. But for general attacks with unknown malware not on VT, I agree with the exspurt above, it's quite robust at detecting those, as well as detecting things like update channel compromises and modifications of existing malware. If you are worried about advanced attacks then Windows probably isn't a good choice to begin with, regardless of what security you are using.
I'm still waiting for someone to take up my hub offer..
