Firefox surpasses Vivaldi even in UI customization. Vivaldi just lets you change predefined UI elements. Firefox UI is based on CSS and with a little bit of CSS knowledge, you could technically completely change the UI and if you like, make Firefox look exactly like Chrome.@Marko :) ’s analysis is spot on because it avoids the "best browser" trap and focuses on the real trade-offs: standards, privacy, and control.
I agree that Firefox offers a unique level of internal customization thanks to about:config, though it’s also worth recognizing that Vivaldi leads the way in UI/interface personalization. In that sense, each plays in its own field: Firefox as a deep-tinker lab and Vivaldi as a visual design workshop.
Ultimately, it’s about choosing our tool based on our priorities:
- Firefox: The laboratory for those who want total control over the engine.
- Vivaldi: The workshop for those who live in their browser and need visual productivity.
- Brave: The 'out-of-the-box' balance for privacy and Chromium speed.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Absolutely! Some might not prioritize ad blocking or privacy like I do. That's alright.If we consider it "the best browser for user x", it would make more sense; what fits me does not necessarily fit everyone else.
I have my unique taste of browsers; I'm currently using a browser not used by most, or even may by no members at all, but I like it, regardless of how percentage of MT users are preferring browser y or z.
I will not eat sushi because many people say its taste is good.





