Software Review League of Antivirus - Panda Dome Free Antivirus 20.00.00 vs Malicious URLs, Phishing URLs, Malware Samples and LoAV SCORE

[JoeN]

Content source

https://youtu.be/48OugqqCtSQ

Panda Dome Free Antivirus 20.00.00 vs Malicious URLs, Phishing URLs, Malware Samples and LoAV SCORE

 

[Pat MacKnife]

Very poor result for Panda, untill now best result by Bitdefender free.
I wonder how free Forticlient will do in this test.

 

[SeriousHoax]

Panda Free don't any network protection so this is expected result and it's mostly dependent on the cloud. I don't consider it as a good free AV but I wonder how it achieves this types of results in AV-Comparatives?!

Real-World Protection Test July-August 2020 - Factsheet

Take a look at the Real-World Protection July-August 2020 Factsheet, a short overview of the results, more details will in the full release!

www.av-comparatives.org

Malware Protection Test September 2020

The Malware Protection Test September 2020 assesses program’s ability to protect a system against malicious files before, during or after execution.

www.av-comparatives.org

 

[JoeN]

Very poor result for Panda, untill now best result by Bitdefender free.
I wonder how free Forticlient will do in this test.

I will look on Forticlient very soon, but now I still have AVG AntiVirus FREE and Kaspersky Security Cloud Free in this bundle of tests. Thanks for all support!

 

[Behold Eck]

| also have been wondering about these results, considering that the detection rates have gone down and the loss of it`s web filter ??

Regards Eck

 

[JoeN]

Identity protection for online security while browsing, shopping and banking is included in ADVANCED or above version.

 

[AYIZEB]

panda is dead, he no longer plays in the effective antivirus league, it's a shame there was a time when panda was a good antivirus package, that's a thing of the past ...

 

[JoeN]

@Pat MacKnife do you know by any chance from where to get latest FortiClient Endpoint Protection Free? I have some v4 beta 3 from filehippo, but I think this is not the latest one.

 

[Pat MacKnife]

Yes

FortiClient Unified Agent for ZTNA, Secure Remote Access and Endpoint Protection | Fortinet

FortiClient Fabric Agent integrates endpoints into the Security Fabric and provides endpoint telemetry, including user identity, protection status, risk scores, unpatched vulnerabilities, security events, and more.

www.forticlient.com

and scroll down to version 6.0 (gray button download)

Also see this

FortiClient 6.0.9.0277 | MalwareTips

Here my review about FortiClient 6.0.9.0277 :)

malwaretips.com

You have to unlock setting to enable webshield block malicious websites ....

 

[Cortex]

The last time I used Panda (dome) it broke Shadow Defender my favourite program

 

[Thales]

Hey. Could you test F-Secure safe please?

 

[JoeN]

@Thales I will test it with other paid solutions in near future, Thanks!

 

[misterman2100]

Panda Free don't any network protection so this is expected result and it's mostly dependent on the cloud. I don't consider it as a good free AV but I wonder how it achieves this types of results in AV-Comparatives?!

Real-World Protection Test July-August 2020 - Factsheet

Take a look at the Real-World Protection July-August 2020 Factsheet, a short overview of the results, more details will in the full release!

www.av-comparatives.org

Malware Protection Test September 2020

The Malware Protection Test September 2020 assesses program’s ability to protect a system against malicious files before, during or after execution.

www.av-comparatives.org

 

[TairikuOkami]

Panda Free don't any network protection so this is expected result and it's mostly dependent on the cloud. I don't consider it as a good free AV but I wonder how it achieves this types of results in AV-Comparatives?! [/URL]

There is no extra detail report, but they mention default configuration for consumers, so I image Edge + smartscreen.
I like MRG tests, the disable smartscreen except for WD, but when they did WD test without it, it performed horribly.

 

[SeriousHoax]

There is no extra detail report, but they mention default configuration for consumers, so I image Edge + smartscreen.
I like MRG tests, the disable smartscreen except for WD, but when they did WD test without it, it performed horribly.

It makes sense to keep SmartScreen enabled for WD but not for other AV. So AVC probably disable that too for other products. Maybe Panda blocks everything unknown that's downloaded over internet which results in more blocks but high false positives.

 

[AYIZEB]

Here in Spain, when you went to have your pc repaired, the computer offered you to install panda, but beyond that panda, right now it is a low product, having, kaspersky, bitdefender etc ...

 

[roger_m]

Maybe Panda blocks everything unknown that's downloaded over internet which results in more blocks but high false positives.

I used Panda for some time a few years ago and only had minor issue with false positives, even though I was regularly downloading PUPs and lesser known software. Its behaviour blocker, never blocked anything either.

 

[SpiderWeb]

It's sad. Panda used to be one of the best.

 

[SeriousHoax]

I used Panda for some time a few years ago and only had minor issue with false positives, even though I was regularly downloading PUPs and lesser known software. Its behaviour blocker, never blocked anything either.

Does it require MOTM for blocking unknown exe files? Were you downloading via browser or other download managers?
I mean I'm just trying to understand how come they achieve that 100% detection while literally no one says that it's a good AV.