Serious Discussion Panda Free Antivirus

upnorth

Level 68
Verified
Top Poster
Malware Hunter
Well-known
Jul 27, 2015
5,458
How come no one talks about Panda Antivirus here?
People do, but not too positive as for many obvious known reasons that's been going on for years. At least for those that regular test AV solutions. My own personal experience was less then happy chappie last time I felt curious enough, and I am talking about the free home version just to be clear.
2022-10-30-11-21-58.jpg

But to be some what fair and try to avoid throw those that still like and use it under the buss so to speak, it's strongly recommended to Enable what's called Application Control ( AC ) as that's not on by default and it really really should be. Use it also with a combo and never ever on anything else then a SUA ( standard user account ). In the end, yes it does exist other 100% free AVs.
 

Trident

Level 34
Verified
Top Poster
Well-known
Feb 7, 2023
2,349
Enable what's called Application Control ( AC ) as that's not on by default and it really really should be.
But it produces too many alerts, even if you execute malware, it will first show the AC alert and then it will display the message “1 Virus Deleted”. If someone is looking for technology executed to a very low standard and totally lacking any sense as well as quality control, Panda will fulfil their dreams.
 

TairikuOkami

Level 37
Verified
Top Poster
Content Creator
Well-known
May 13, 2017
2,638
I would never ever rely on Panda alone, but when combined with a decent DNS, like NextDNS, ControlID or CloudFlare, it will do, especially after system hardening.
He says its 10-15% lighter than Kaspersky Free. So it's very damn light.
More like 300-500% lighter and not just RAM, CPU and I/O as well, but as a real cloud AV it has obviously a constant network usage.
Kaspersky showed about 300-500MB if I recall correctly, but I have removed related screenshots, since I no longer recommend it.

capture-11092022-213939.jpg
 

SillyBilly299

Level 17
Verified
Top Poster
Well-known
Apr 26, 2015
815
Other than being lightweight on system, there is no reason to use it. If I want a third-party antivirus, I would rather choose a reputable and well-known one like Kaspersky or Bitdefender, which also provide free option. Otherwise, I would just stick with Windows Defender.
 

Spartan

Level 3
Thread author
Verified
Well-known
Apr 15, 2019
118
Gamers may prefer the lowest possible system impact to the actual best security.
This, not a gamer but I care about performance more. All my programs are genuine/licenses and I have an adblocker so all I need really is a file scanner and nothing else, not even HTTP scanning

But I don't think that Panda is the lightest solution out there, even tho it often depends on the individual systems
It is, tried them all, literally.

It's one of the lightest antiviruses there is, alongside K7 and 360 Total Security. There are some people who find it heavy, but they are rare instances.
K7 is so light as well but it has a built in firewall which I don't want

Other than being lightweight on system, there is no reason to use it. If I want a third-party antivirus, I would rather choose a reputable and well-known one like Kaspersky or Bitdefender, which also provide free option. Otherwise, I would just stick with Windows Defender.
Kaspersky is not bad but what I don't like about it is that it installs a root certificate for the browser and nags you to install its browser extension although you can disable that notification.

When was the last time you tried Bitdefender Free? It has the same exact UI as Bitdefender Total security with so many buttons not relative to it that if you click on would prompt you to upgrade (ie. VPN, System booster). I may be picky but I don't like AVs that do this. I specifically chose the entry level version because that's all I need don't try to throw features I don't want in my face thinking I might upgrade.
 

piquiteco

Level 14
Verified
Top Poster
Well-known
Oct 16, 2022
624
Webroot and Panda Free are the lightest out there. About the issue of protection against this, left the ball to the testers. My dad still uses webroot on an old computer with 2GB of ram, that only gets on Youtube and does a google search once in a while lol. :LOL: I went one day to format and install linux, when I messed around and saw that it was working fine, I thought to myself, whoa! don't mess with what is working and I left it the way it is there running for years on his computer.:)
 

Trident

Level 34
Verified
Top Poster
Well-known
Feb 7, 2023
2,349
It is, tried them all, literally.
Lighter than tweaked Eset?
Webroot and Panda Free are the lightest out there. About the issue of protection against this, left the ball to the testers. My dad still uses webroot on an old computer with 2GB of ram, that only gets on Youtube and does a google search once in a while lol. :LOL: I went one day to format and install linux, when I messed around and saw that it was working fine, I thought to myself, whoa! don't mess with what is working and I left it the way it is there running for years on his computer.:)
Well tbh Webroot is better than Panda. Panda is the rock bottom.
 

piquiteco

Level 14
Verified
Top Poster
Well-known
Oct 16, 2022
624
Well tbh Webroot is better than Panda. Panda is the rock bottom.
Apparently it seems so, one day I grabbed a Keylogger I don't remember what the name of the app was to see how webroot would behave it didn't detect it, but webroot denied access to the app which prevented it from recording the keys pressed on the keyboard, I was impressed, only AV I've seen do that, the rest of the AV's removed it as a threat, I thought it's looking like spyshelter lol. :LOL:
 

Spartan

Level 3
Thread author
Verified
Well-known
Apr 15, 2019
118
Lighter than tweaked Eset?

Well tbh Webroot is better than Panda. Panda is the rock bottom.
they are the same really, the only caveat (for me) is NOD32 has an HTTP scanner. Sometimes I would be on a webpage while using my VPN and the page wouldn't load properly but when I disable NOD32 it loads just fine. This really bugs the hell out of me and if you disable HTTP scanning the ESET icon turns orange like something is wrong which messes with my OCD.

Damn HTTP scanners, I hate them so much if they're gonna come in the way of my workflow.

Apparently it seems so, one day I grabbed a Keylogger I don't remember what the name of the app was to see how webroot would behave it didn't detect it, but webroot denied access to the app which prevented it from recording the keys pressed on the keyboard, I was impressed, only AV I've seen do that, the rest of the AV's removed it as a threat, I thought it's looking like spyshelter lol. :LOL:
Doesn't Webroot also have an HTTP scanner that was introduced a while back? That's when I stopped using it.
 

Trident

Level 34
Verified
Top Poster
Well-known
Feb 7, 2023
2,349
Doesn't Webroot also have an HTTP scanner that was introduced a while back? That's when I stopped using it.
Do they? I wasn’t aware… I am not monitoring them that closely but on the guides and everything no HTTPS scanning is mentioned. I was researching today the evasion and foreign code shields (apparently the latter is available in home products). May be time to put them to a test. Webroot against Panda… @Shadowra can assist as well.
 

Spartan

Level 3
Thread author
Verified
Well-known
Apr 15, 2019
118

Indingo

Level 1
Jun 15, 2020
27
I've always questioned Av-Comparative.
In my tests and those of the Hub, Panda is one of the worst antivirus programs.
I invite you to have a look at my tests on it, I think you'll make up your own mind :)

Would you be interested in testing Panda Essential, rather than Panda Free? I have done my own limited testing and it seems that paid Panda products seem to receive faster cloud responses. Panda Essential is their cheapest paid product which has monthly payments for around $2 for unlimited devices. I have seen for myself in a limited way that this potential priority for the paid versions to get quicker cloud results, seems to impact performance and accuracy in the product. It would be interesting to see if the paid product with both the two settings for scanning within compressed files and application control on would actually make the product viable.
 

Shadowra

Level 36
Verified
Top Poster
Content Creator
Malware Tester
Well-known
Sep 2, 2021
2,586
Would you be interested in testing Panda Essential, rather than Panda Free? I have done my own limited testing and it seems that paid Panda products seem to receive faster cloud responses. Panda Essential is their cheapest paid product which has monthly payments for around $2 for unlimited devices. I have seen for myself in a limited way that this potential priority for the paid versions to get quicker cloud results, seems to impact performance and accuracy in the product. It would be interesting to see if the paid product with both the two settings for scanning within compressed files and application control on would actually make the product viable.

I've already made a comparison between the free and paid versions of Panda, and the detection was identical.
 

tofargone

Level 4
Jun 24, 2024
174
Well I installed Panda Dome Essential. I know that most of you fine people don't like it, but I love the speed. I am not a risky user. I surf do email ETC.
I had also tested K7 for its speed, but Panda has a couple things that pushed it over the finish line.
It does have a few features I really like, besides the speed.

1). it is install and leave.
2). it asks to scan inserted drives and USBs.
3). If I install a software item that it is unaware of its asks if I want to allow it to install, and if I say yes, it then asks if I want to allow it to run.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TairikuOkami

tofargone

Level 4
Jun 24, 2024
174
Not a Spanish company anymore, ownership is a Seattle company based in Spain.:

WatchGuard was initially established in 1996 under the name Seattle Software Labs, Inc.[2] Its inaugural product was a network firewall known as the WatchGuard Security Management System,[3] which included the WatchGuard Firebox, a "firewall in a box" security appliance, along with configuration and administration software.[4]

In 1997, the company rebranded itself as WatchGuard Technologies, Inc.[2]

Come July 1999, WatchGuard Technologies, Inc. went public, trading on Nasdaq.[5]

In October 2006, the company was acquired for $151 million by private equity firms Francisco Partners and Vector Capital. Bruce Coleman assumed the role of interim CEO.[6]

In August 2007, Joe Wang took over as the company's permanent CEO, succeeding Coleman.[7][6]

In May 2014, CEO Wang stepped down, and interim CEO Michael Kohlsdorf, an operating partner with Francisco Partners, assumed leadership.[8]

In April 2015, Kohlsdorf passed the CEO mantle to Prakash Panjwani.[9] It was announced that both Panjwani and Kohlsdorf were joining WatchGuard's board.[10]

In June 2016, the company acquired HawkEye G, a threat-detection and response technology from Hexis Cyber Solutions, now part of KEYW Holding Corp.[9] In October, the company launched the WatchGuard Wi-Fi Cloud to expand its network security coverage to Wi-Fi networks.[11]

In August 2017, WatchGuard acquired Datablink, a provider of multi-factor authentication software used to secure laptops, servers, and other devices.[12]

In January 2018, the company acquired Percipient Networks, a domain name system security service provider. Later it was renamed as DNSWatch. [13]

In July 2018, the company unveiled AuthPoint, an application designed to offer multi-factor authentication security for businesses.[14]

In March 2020, WatchGuard announced an agreement to acquire Bilbao-based Panda Security, a provider of network endpoint security.[15] The deal was finalized in June.[16]
 

About us

  • MalwareTips is a community-driven platform providing the latest information and resources on malware and cyber threats. Our team of experienced professionals and passionate volunteers work to keep the internet safe and secure. We provide accurate, up-to-date information and strive to build a strong and supportive community dedicated to cybersecurity.

User Menu

Follow us

Follow us on Facebook or Twitter to know first about the latest cybersecurity incidents and malware threats.

Top