New Update Ungoogled Chromium

[HarborFront]

So with some of these, the extensions are more difficult to install?

Not for Elosotn flavor but not sure of the woolyss flavor as I'm not using it

Read through the 4 pages on this thread and the manner extensions are uploaded NOT directly from Chrome Web Store are there. Basically, 3 easy methods include

1) Installing the Ungoogled Chromium Extension Installer extension
2) Go to crxextractor.com to install the extensions
3) Download the crx file (from either crxextractor.com or crx4chrome.com) for the extension and then drag-and-drop onto the extension page in UC

For UC you can also install extensions from non-Chrome Web Store. Chrome browser prevents you from installing from 3rd-party stores

 

[Trooper]

Not for Elosotn flavor but not sure of the woolyss flavor as I'm not using it

Read through the 4 pages on this thread and the manner extensions are uploaded NOT directly from Chrome Web Store are there. Basically, 3 easy methods include

1) Installing the Ungoogled Chromium Extension Installer extension
2) Go to crxextractor.com to install the extensions
3) Download the crx file (from either crxextractor.com or crx4chrome.com) for the extension and then drag-and-drop onto the extension page in UC

For UC you can also install extensions from non-Chrome Web Store. Chrome browser prevents you from installing from 3rd-party stores

Thanks I will have a look at this thread. Which build are you running and why?

 

[oldschool]

I would still prefer to have the most up to date one with patches etc.

Use UC from Marmaduke @ woolyss.com for most frequently updated ungoogled version. Yes, all of a sudden it is a bit behind the Eloston version, which was last updated in May, whereas Marmaduke's was last updated July 19.

So with some of these, the extensions are more difficult to install?

@HarborFront is right. These are all easy methods for installing extensions. I generally use Method #3, but sometimes grab it directly from GitHub/Lab and drag/drop - depending on extension - which I suppose makes this Method #4.

I use this version since it updates the same as Brave release, and has some (?) extra flags not found in Eloston.

 

[HarborFront]

Thanks I will have a look at this thread. Which build are you running and why?

I'm using the Eloston version all these while. Unless the UC flavor by Marmaduke @ woolyss.com is identical to the Elsoton I might switch over.

Eloston's flavor is contributed by different authors but Marmaduke @ woolyss.com is authored by him only

 

[SearchLight]

UC from Marmaduke @ woolyss.com

Marmaduke does not have an installer? Only available as portable? The one above it, Hibbiki has one. Btw, what is the difference between Marmaduke and Hibbiki? Two different people? Thanks.

 

[HarborFront]

Use UC from Marmaduke @ woolyss.com for most frequently updated ungoogled version. Yes, all of a sudden it is a bit behind the Eloston version, which was last updated in May, whereas Marmaduke's was last updated July 19.

@HarborFront is right. These are all easy methods for installing extensions. I generally use Method #3, but sometimes grab it directly from GitHub/Lab and drag/drop - depending on extension - which I suppose makes this Method #4.

I use this version since it updates the same as Brave release, and has some (?) extra flags not found in Eloston.

Likely because Brave moves faster than the Eloston UC so there are some flags not available

At this moment both Brave and UC@Eloston are at the same version and build. Any new flags Brave has that are not available in UC?

 

[HarborFront]

Marmaduke does not have an installer? Only available as portable? The one above it, Hibbiki has one. Btw, what is the difference between Marmaduke and Hibbiki? Two different people? Thanks.

There are many UC flavors compiled by different authors and hosted by them at github or other depositories even for the same OS platform. Choose the one you need and stick to the same author

From below

Download latest stable Chromium binaries (64-bit and 32-bit)

Download latest stable Chromium binaries for Windows, Mac, Linux, BSD and Android (64-bit and 32-bit)

chromium.woolyss.com

Hibbiki don't have a Ungoogled Chromium flavor

 

[oldschool]

Eloston UC so there are some flags not available

I meant that Eloston has different flags than Marmaduke. M has 3 fingerprinting flags and last I checked E had only 1 or 2, before today's update.

 

[HarborFront]

I meant that Eloston has different flags than Marmaduke. M has 3 fingerprinting flags and last I checked E had only 1 or 2, before today's update.

FYI, UC by Eloston already has the following flags in v81 against fingerprinting because I'm using Eloston's flavor all these while

• Enable get*ClientRects() fingerprint deception
• Enable Canvas::measureText() fingerprint deception
• Enable Canvas image data fingerprint deception

Are they the same as Marmaduke?

 

[oldschool]

FYI, UC by Eloston already has the following flags in v81 against fingerprinting because I'm using Eloston's flavor all these while

• Enable get*ClientRects() fingerprint deception
• Enable Canvas::measureText() fingerprint deception
• Enable Canvas image data fingerprint deception

Are they the same as Marmaduke?

Yes. I think the last Eloston version didn't have all these? Only the new version?

 

[HarborFront]

Yes. I think the last Eloston version didn't have all these? Only the new version?

In v81 UC at Eloston has them

 

[oldschool]

In v81 UC at Eloston has them

I must have overlooked 1 or 2.

 

[HarborFront]

For those using UC@woolyss by Marmaduke please note the v84 (and previous versions) has widevine built-in which belongs to Google

Download latest stable Chromium binaries (64-bit and 32-bit)

Download latest stable Chromium binaries for Windows, Mac, Linux, BSD and Android (64-bit and 32-bit)

chromium.woolyss.com

Releases · macchrome/winchrome

Chromium for 64-bit Windows - All Codecs: MS Visual Studio 2017 - macchrome/winchrome

github.com

Someone raised an issue on whether UC by Marmaduke is trustable and why it wasn't hosted at Eloston's site. And Eloston replied below.

...................................... · Issue #73 · ungoogled-software/ungoogled-chromium-binaries

.........................

github.com

 

[oldschool]

Based on my recent testing, Ungoogled Chromium has better built-in fingerprinting protection (when enabled in chrome://flags) than Brave browser.

 

[oldschool]

Based on my recent testing, Ungoogled Chromium has better built-in fingerprinting protection (when enabled in chrome://flags) than Brave browser.

I have to revise this. I re-tested and they perform the same. So the choice is yours. I find Chromium to be a bit slow opening pages on occasion.

 

[HarborFront]

Ungoogled Chromium v84.0.4147.125-1 for Win x64 released at Eloston site

Downloads for ungoogled-chromium

 

[klepto]

Is there somewhere a list of flags to enable or disable? I've been trying to move to most of the apps I use being portable for easy backup/restore purposes.

 

[HarborFront]

Is there somewhere a list of flags to enable or disable? I've been trying to move to most of the apps I use being portable for easy backup/restore purposes.

Here is the List of Flags and Switches use in UC at Eloston

Eloston/ungoogled-chromium

You can also use some of those flags in Chrome browser

Chrome - List of Interesting Experimental Flags for Google Chrome

 

[HarborFront]

Ungoogled Chromium v84.0.4147.135-1 for Win x64 released at Eloston site

Downloads for ungoogled-chromium

 

[HarborFront]

Ungoogled Chromium v85.0.4183.102-1 for Win x64 released at Eloston site

Downloads for ungoogled-chromium