Open MalwareTips from your Home Screen or desktop. Follow discussions, find answers and pick up where you left off.
If you cannot find an install option, update your browser or use its bookmark option to keep MalwareTips close.
After installation, open the app and sign in. Enable push notifications in Preferences if you want alerts. On iPhone and iPad, push requires a Home Screen web app and iOS or iPadOS 16.4 or later.
Sign in to manage notificationsInstallation is optional. Your notification settings stay under your control.
www.elevenforum.com
The issue is just with Wsie Care 365 V6.6.6, older versions have no issue.Also using wise disk cleaner for years here, no issue right now with MS defender.
No the problem only with wise Care 365, but Wise Disk Cleaner and Wise Registry Cleaner have no problems at all.Version 6.7.1 is also detected on Virustotal by various security vendors... I have always used this software without any problems... My question is, aren't they boycotting it because it's Chinese?
The most resent detection is: PUA:Win32/PCCleanNo. Microsoft and other AV block or delete based upon the product reputation as scareware (misleading product messages). That is why the recent detection is:
Misleading:Win32/Lodi
It can be any of them:The most resent detection is: PUA:Win32/PCClean
If I understand you well, is Microsoft use MS Defender to get money by doing this?It can be any of them:
- PUA: Win32/WiseCare (2017)
- Misleading: Win32/Lodi (2024)
- PUA: Win32/PCClean (2024)
These detections (signatures) are all still in Microsoft's active Defender signatures database. Sometimes you can get different detection signatures for the same file. There can be variations between Windows 10 and 11 and even between different build numbers of Windows or the Defender detection engine.
No matter what it is as a dedicated user of WiseCleaner it will be a PITA for you. Best just to create an Allow exception in Defender.
Microsoft Security is going to keep generating new signatures for programs such as Wise until the publisher joins their Partnership program and pays all the money and jumps through all the hoops to get Microsoft to leave them alone. Essentially that is an accurate characterization of it. Otherwise the development teams has contact Microsoft and submit infos every single time a new signature is created.
Most, if not all, of these detections are based upon Microsoft categorizing the product's reputation as "suspicious."
Not directly. Some software publishers pay the money and go through the process of extended validation to obtain a permanent whitelisting by Microsoft of the Authenticode digital signature. Others join one of the various Microsoft industry initiatives.If I understand you well, is Microsoft use MS Defender to get money by doing this?
Members who viewed this thread in the last 5 minutes