- Dec 27, 2016
- 1,480
Last edited:
Then I need to say that you didn't saw yet my Defender tests. I know that I'm testing with Hard_Configurator but Defender does a big part too!It's extremely shocking for me to see Microsoft outperforming Emsisoft. Wow!
"Next-gen" AV. No clue why it's included in the real-world tests as they only sell to enterprise clients.Never herd of CrowdStrike !
Same. They continue to respect my privacy and I'll continue to give them my money.Well I don't care what Real-World Protection Test - AV-Comparatives says i am sticking with Emsisoft | Anti-Malware: Lightweight Malware Protection for the Home for the time being. More than happy with it.
I can safely say most FPs originate from DeepGuard - Rare application.Wow, since when have Microsoft and Panda become so good?
Also, I wonder when will F-Secure fix their horrific false positive rates.
(Assuming those tests were representative of real life scenario, which I highly doubt.)
Well I don't care what Real-World Protection Test - AV-Comparatives says i am sticking with Emsisoft | Anti-Malware: Lightweight Malware Protection for the Home for the time being. More than happy with it.
Microsoft have been improving with signatures lately but regardless of this test, Emsisoft is superior in terms of the potential for protection when compared to Windows Defender, due to factors such as their Surf Protection and Behavior Blocker modules. I would suspect they are also much more reactive in terms of adding new signature detection's.It's extremely shocking for me to see Microsoft outperforming Emsisoft. Wow!
I think we all need this after seeing these results...
Look at False positive
ESET and McAfee are wins
https://www.av-comparatives.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/avc_mpt_201709_en.pdf
Norton is Very High False Positive