pablozi's config - updated: 11.08.2013
- Thread starter enaph
- Start date
- Status
RE: pablozi's config - updated: 08.06.2012
Mbam detects what kaspersky,emsisoft,avast,avira,bitdefender misses.
And how is combo of emsisoft it is light or heavy as it used to be.
Mbam is good on demand scanner even if you best av on your system.pablozi said:
Mbam detects what kaspersky,emsisoft,avast,avira,bitdefender misses.
And how is combo of emsisoft it is light or heavy as it used to be.
RE: pablozi's config - updated: 08.06.2012
EAM improved a lot (less than 10mb WS in idle), OAP is a bit heavier (around 30mb), the impact on system is still correct, just the updating process use resources. Scans are fast enough.
D-ONE said:And how is combo of emsisoft it is light or heavy as it used to be.
EAM improved a lot (less than 10mb WS in idle), OAP is a bit heavier (around 30mb), the impact on system is still correct, just the updating process use resources. Scans are fast enough.
RE: pablozi's config - updated: 12.07.2012
MBAM Pro as real time: Is it worth it? If I recall correctly not many users here used MBAM RT features. Think it had to do with resources. Not sure
MBAM Pro as real time: Is it worth it? If I recall correctly not many users here used MBAM RT features. Think it had to do with resources. Not sure
RE: pablozi's config - updated: 12.07.2012
I am among the ones that dont like its RT features, reasons :
1- Url filter gives lot of FPs
2- Signature based RT protection.
3- 30+mb WS of RAM, too much just for that
now maybe the latest version changes that.
I am among the ones that dont like its RT features, reasons :
1- Url filter gives lot of FPs
2- Signature based RT protection.
3- 30+mb WS of RAM, too much just for that
now maybe the latest version changes that.
RE: pablozi's config - updated: 12.07.2012
Ah so it was more than just the RAM. will be interesting to see the tests I will do in next few days!
Ah so it was more than just the RAM. will be interesting to see the tests I will do in next few days!
RE: pablozi's config - updated: 12.07.2012
If you have good powerful computer you can use mbam pro but for general user its resource hogger and real time av with mbam on demand is enough to protect machine
If you have good powerful computer you can use mbam pro but for general user its resource hogger and real time av with mbam on demand is enough to protect machine
- Jun 14, 2011
- 1,857
RE: pablozi's config - updated: 12.07.2012
My laptop is not so powerful: Samsung R510 with Intel Core2 Duo (T5750) @2GHz, 3GB RAM, nVidia GeForce 9200M GS, but so far I do not feel any slowdown while browsing websites or running apps.
My laptop is not so powerful: Samsung R510 with Intel Core2 Duo (T5750) @2GHz, 3GB RAM, nVidia GeForce 9200M GS, but so far I do not feel any slowdown while browsing websites or running apps.
RE: pablozi's config - updated: 12.07.2012
Maybe,
How is Nis 2012 can you briefly compare it with other Internet suites which u have tried in last 3 months.(on resource not detection)
pablozi said:
Maybe,
How is Nis 2012 can you briefly compare it with other Internet suites which u have tried in last 3 months.(on resource not detection)
RE: pablozi's config - updated: 12.07.2012
yes indeed very light
pablozi said:NIS is very, very light. Completely no impact on web browsing speed, running apps or download speed. Like it wasn't there.
yes indeed very light
- Jun 14, 2011
- 1,857
RE: pablozi's config - updated: 14.08.2012
So once again some changes were made. I have removed NIS and Chrome.
Now DWPF + MBAM Pro are working in realtime and Chrome is replaced with latest stable release of Opera browser.
Chrome was causing very high CPU usage so cooler was working continously while browsing and with Opera I have the same browsing speed, UI is very responsive and finally I do not hear that CPU cooler is working
So once again
some changes were made. I have removed NIS and Chrome.Now DWPF + MBAM Pro are working in realtime and Chrome is replaced with latest stable release of Opera browser.
Chrome was causing very high CPU usage so cooler was working continously while browsing and with Opera I have the same browsing speed, UI is very responsive and finally I do not hear that CPU cooler is working
RE: pablozi's config - updated: 14.08.2012
I had that Chrome issue back in about a month or so. So what I did at that time reverted to the previous build and then skipped the build that was causing CPU usage spikes (mine was spikes not continuously).
I had that Chrome issue back in about a month or so. So what I did at that time reverted to the previous build and then skipped the build that was causing CPU usage spikes (mine was spikes not continuously).
- Status
Similar threads
