- Apr 21, 2018
- 397
Good choice.I am using KSCF because you can tweak more settings than in KFA so it doesn't need to intsall OSArmor, it's a little bit heavy at least on my system.7/4/2019
Uninstalled
Webroot SecureAnywhere
Added
KFA + OSArmor
Good choice.I am using KSCF because you can tweak more settings than in KFA so it doesn't need to intsall OSArmor, it's a little bit heavy at least on my system.7/4/2019
Uninstalled
Webroot SecureAnywhere
Added
KFA + OSArmor
I choice KFA because is install and forget. And with ssd now i have not any Delay. Πάει σφαίρα.Good choice.I am using KSCF because you can tweak more settings than in KFA so it doesn't need to intsall OSArmor, it's a little bit heavy at least on my system.
KFA is more stable from KSCF. Have not any bug and works perfect. Need only 285 MB space on disk . Very low ram about 50 to 80 mb. And with ssd disk I did not feel any difference on boot time or any delay to aplications to switch from webroot secureAnyway to KFA. I stoped auto scan and scan for rootkits and thts all.I will wait to hear your experience with KFA web filter or any bugs.
Same for KSCF i have installed, 50 to 80 mb ram,stable, no bugs (Windows 10 1809), but with many more settings to harden than KFA.It's like KIS without TAM.KFA is more stable from KSCF. Have not any bug and works perfect. Need only 285 MB space on disk . Very low ram about 50 to 80 mb. And with ssd disk I did not feel any difference on boot time or any delay to aplications to switch from webroot secureAnyway to KFA. I stoped auto scan and scan for rootkits and thts all.
Better for me . Not need translatorKaspersky Free Products also don't have Application Control + FireWall, and other extra features
In my opinion KFA doesn't need VS, it's very strong from its own. Maybe OSA is more suitable.OSA and not VS?
ASC the last version have now one good registry protection and Application Control. And realy works wellKaspersky Free Products also don't have Application Control + FireWall, and other extra features