This is done to test your AV in different scenarios and with different modules, not that the AV depends on a single module to protect you. And to see how the av behaves, without signatures. Everyone does it. Is that why I have to have attacks? or giggles? I hope that Eset improves on unknown malware with this 18v. My point is, I don't want an AV that depends on a single technology to protect you, that's what I'm going for:Who in their right mind would go around deactivating core protection features of their AV software and expect it to work? What you are going on about is illogical.
You are trying to adapt the software around some arbitrary test. That's not how testing anything goes.
Windows Defender: you deactivate the cloud and your PC will be filled with viruses, that's what I'm saying. If there is malware that bypasses the cloud, will your computer be infected? is it understood?
Comodo: you deactivate its autocontainer, and your av will do nothing. That's my point and I want you to understand it. YouTubers are precisely the most important in trying an AV, since they are the closest to reality. On the other hand, in a laboratory, you will never see their tests, only results.
Greetings.




