- Mar 19, 2016
- 43
Please reply Pro's and Con's your selections.
So, it's your fault thenBecause it's a good solution, I vote for Kaspersky every time. I have two PCs with paid version of Kaspersky Internet Security.
I love Emsisoft myself, but if I have to be objective. Then I'd pick Kaspersky, then Eset and Sophos in that order. I really do feel that Sophos is kind of underappreciated overall given the extensive features and detection results.
In this case I was referring to the primary solutions, rather than just Hitman Pro. That having said, I do agree with you though.I don't know if is underappreciated, for example my second scanner is HitmanPro and is one of my favorites second opinion scanners. I really like the brand, maybe not for primary AV, but it's my choice for second opinion scanner, I have the paid version of HitmanPro.
Also have Start Emergency Kit as second scanner, my security solution his composed for KIS primary defense system, two light scanners as complement Hitman and Emergency Kit.
Because it's that good, most other suites end up causing issues, ESET despite being light is not install and forget and requires management from the user, not to mention has the highest rate of FP among the top products (which is not a good solution for a family PC).Why Kaspersky wins every poll like this
This is the opposite of my experience. I’ve installed ESET and had to manage nothing for months on multiple machines. I’ve never had a false positive. And they regularly have one of the lowest FP rates in testing (which is up to you to trust). Also, the necessity of using special HIPS rules is overblown unless you are in a very sensitive business environment at risk for ransom ware. For a home user I’ve found it very capable of install and forget.Because it's that good, most other suites end up causing issues, ESET despite being light is not install and forget and requires management from the user, not to mention has the highest rate of FP among the top products (which is not a good solution for a family PC).