1/ the advantage of adding ZAM is I have signatures. Using CF solely provides close to 0 signature. The other reason is CF sandboxes so many of my programs. I install new things almost everyday so I have to whitelist or temporarily disable the sandbox in order to run the files. for example, CF sandboxed my firefox quantum installer this morning and I'm sure it's clean1. What is the advantage of using ZAM beside CFW in terms of strengthen your system protection? since you already have a powerful Sandbox which has the ability to stop and block even the most advanced Ransomware yet.
Let's guess we allowed the malware to be actively running outside the Sandbox of CFW...
2. What the situation be like?
3. Will ZAM be able to stop and block the malware effectively by using its signatures?
Thanks for answering bro
I just try to train myself so I can revenge my friends. I was like a beginner/dumb last 2 weeks but I'm much better nowIt's my high honor to find someone else on MT forums who plays FIFA 18
I decided to use Avast Free along with CFW and I prefer Avast Free over ZAM in terms of malware protection and FPs.Removed:
- Avast free
- Zemana Antilogger (pandora): I miss its performance
1/ in default settings, there could be conflicts between avast and CF1. Do you recommend this combination for me using all of your modified settings/tweaks?
2. Will I face any protection break or conflict in using this combo between Avast Free and CFW? Thank you very much for your good explanation bro
I think zemana + CF would be the lightest be the least secure if you allow a malware to run bypassing CF1. EAM & CFW@cruelsister
2. Avast Free & CFW@cruelsister
3. Kaspersky Free & CFW@cruelsister
4. Zemana Antimalware & CFW@cruelsister
yes I did have conflicts (BSODs) due to hardware-assisted virtualization. They both utilize hardware virtualization -> conflicts. Disable that -> problem completely solvedCould you please describe that combo situation to me the last time you tried Avast Free with CFW? Have you seen any issues or conflict?
Have you done any modifications on both softwares to solve any issues/conflicts within the combo? Thanks bro
I thought you used Cent.Installed:
- Windows 8.1 Pro -> million times more responsive than W10CU, literally
- Slimjet x86: recommended by the developer instead of the x64 version. Faster, smoother than chrome x64 anyway
- norton safe web
the differences are based on the memory usage, smoothness when you do intensive tasks, startup speed and how frequent the browser freezesI thought you used Cent.
How do you notice differences among chromium-based browsers and among some antivirus
Thank you for answering me bro. Your knowledge is very helpfulavast + CF would be the best but only with Behavior shield install -> this would make this the heaviest combo because of Behavior shield
with hardened mode aggressive enabled, cybercapture is nearly useless. cybercapture never works for me, I consider it a half-baked featureThank you for answering me bro. Your knowledge is very helpful
You already told me that Avast Free + CFW would be the best but only with Behavior shield install. I just saw something on Avast blog regarding Behavior Shield...
"Behavior Shield is our latest weapon against the threat of ransomware and works in conjunction with our CyberCapture real-time analysis."
The last time you tried Avast Free on your system, Have you Enabled "CyberCapture" or not?
If I Enable this feature then Will I face any conflict with CFW? Thanks bro
Malware Geek on Youtube published a video on a great Avast Free performance against ransomware here and he Enabled "CyberCapture" besides Behavior Shield.
What practical differences does the behavioral blocker add to make it better than the others but not when it is disabled. I assume you mean hardened mode.with hardened mode aggressive enabled, cybercapture is nearly useless. cybercapture never works for me, I consider it a half-baked feature
there will be no conflict between avast and CF if hardware virtualization is disabled
1. Why didn't you include EAM & CFW@cruelsister in your recommendation? Have you tried this combo yet?my pick: zemana (for maximum speed) or kaspersky free (max protection and second best speed) + CF
BB will work only when hardened mode fails so it is definitely an additional layer, the last layerWhat practical differences does the behavioral blocker add to make it better than the others but not when it is disabled. I assume you mean hardened mode.
1/ because EAM is minimum $19-20 while all my options are free. No point to use comodo firewall with a paid AV, money-wasting. We will get almost the same protection level because almost nothing can bypass CF if we allow them to bypass. EAM is also recommended but I don't want to pay1. Why didn't you include EAM & CFW@cruelsister in your recommendation? Have you tried this combo yet?
2. If I gave you only 2 combos to choose between:
EAM & CFW@cruelsister and Avast Free & CFW@cruelsister
then Which one will be your choice? and Why?
Thank you very much for your great assistance bro
you can enable it without problemDo you recommend to Disable cybercapture in my Avast Free settings?