Please, do not think that I do not respect your point of view. You have the full right to it. It is justified from the ethical point of view. But @HarborFront has also the right to keep his position.the user is responsible since when?!!!
you use a product because you need it and you don't have the choice, you don't have the skill to install anything else, and the said product keep failing, so it is the user fault?!!! come on, stop being hypocrite.
You buy a car with faulty breaks, you die, who is the responsible ? you? come on...
One could argue this way. Why the car corporations produce the fast cars, and do not care much about the drivers safety. It is the well known fact that many drivers died because of the traffic accidents. The car corporations try to fool the people by introducing seatbelts, airbags, and other security imitations, but everybody knows that the velocity can kill drivers easily.
Do people demand slow cars because some drivers are dying? Do car corporations proceed ethically?
Do the pharmaceutical corporations proceed ethically? Does anybody know the corporation that could proceed ethically? So, why Microsoft should be the only ethical corporation?
And the hard question. Who should be blamed for the fact that corporations are not ethical by default?