Ok I have license key of Quickheal and Avast IS. So which one should I use. I would really like comments from users who have used Quickheal. Also I will install SAS pro alongside quickheal. Also can you recommend a free HIPS/ Anti keylogger software.
Quickheal Internet Security V/s Avast Internet Security
- Thread starter malbky
- Start date
Nope Gdata is far bigger. Even Trustport beats it with 2MBs. A decent firewall. Nothing great. I seriously suspect that it has a firewall or not. Stranger just dont bash any AV products. Its not a third grade crap. It has been tested and awarded by ICSA and VB100. It is also recommended by MS.
malbky said:
I don't bash any product and I am fan of quickheal (for other matter which i cannot mention here)
quickheal av/antimalware have good detection rate
very light on system
but its firewall,I still maintain I haven't seen such poor firewall in my life not even 5-7 years back
Stranger said:
Test and awards I can understand but then we have several issues at hand.
On my review, I used malware packs of 26th and 27th of July. Test was conducted on the 29th of July. Detection rate was rather poor.
Apparent system slowdowns upon launching applications was witnessed on the machine.
Not so sure about being light either. It ain't heavy but it ain't light either.
As for the good detection rate Stranger refers to: Are we speaking globally or regionally?
As for the firewall, like I said, it felt like it didn't exist.
Nevertheless it does have potential for other regions, but they need to make some improvements.
Not bashing the product, but just my opinion based on the observations made during the test and the previous test runs.
- Status
Similar threads
